DataComp-LM: In search of the next generation of training sets for language models
Li, Jeffrey, Fang, Alex, Smyrnis, Georgios, Ivgi, Maor, Jordan, Matt, Gadre, Samir, Bansal, Hritik, Guha, Etash, Keh, Sedrick, Arora, Kushal, Garg, Saurabh, Xin, Rui, Muennighoff, Niklas, Heckel, Reinhard, Mercat, Jean, Chen, Mayee, Gururangan, Suchin, Wortsman, Mitchell, Albalak, Alon, Bitton, Yonatan, Nezhurina, Marianna, Abbas, Amro, Hsieh, Cheng-Yu, Ghosh, Dhruba, Gardner, Josh, Kilian, Maciej, Zhang, Hanlin, Shao, Rulin, Pratt, Sarah, Sanyal, Sunny, Ilharco, Gabriel, Daras, Giannis, Marathe, Kalyani, Gokaslan, Aaron, Zhang, Jieyu, Chandu, Khyathi, Nguyen, Thao, Vasiljevic, Igor, Kakade, Sham, Song, Shuran, Sanghavi, Sujay, Faghri, Fartash, Oh, Sewoong, Zettlemoyer, Luke, Lo, Kyle, El-Nouby, Alaaeldin, Pouransari, Hadi, Toshev, Alexander, Wang, Stephanie, Groeneveld, Dirk, Soldaini, Luca, Koh, Pang Wei, Jitsev, Jenia, Kollar, Thomas, Dimakis, Alexandros G., Carmon, Yair, Dave, Achal, Schmidt, Ludwig, Shankar, Vaishaal
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
We introduce DataComp for Language Models (DCLM), a testbed for controlled dataset experiments with the goal of improving language models. As part of DCLM, we provide a standardized corpus of 240T tokens extracted from Common Crawl, effective pretraining recipes based on the OpenLM framework, and a broad suite of 53 downstream evaluations. Participants in the DCLM benchmark can experiment with data curation strategies such as deduplication, filtering, and data mixing at model scales ranging from 412M to 7B parameters. As a baseline for DCLM, we conduct extensive experiments and find that model-based filtering is key to assembling a high-quality training set. The resulting dataset, DCLM-Baseline enables training a 7B parameter language model from scratch to 64% 5-shot accuracy on MMLU with 2.6T training tokens. Compared to MAP-Neo, the previous state-of-the-art in open-data language models, DCLM-Baseline represents a 6.6 percentage point improvement on MMLU while being trained with 40% less compute. Our baseline model is also comparable to Mistral-7B-v0.3 and Llama 3 8B on MMLU (63% & 66%), and performs similarly on an average of 53 natural language understanding tasks while being trained with 6.6x less compute than Llama 3 8B. Our results highlight the importance of dataset design for training language models and offer a starting point for further research on data curation.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Jun-20-2024
- Country:
- South America > Falkland Islands (0.04)
- North America
- Dominican Republic (0.04)
- United States
- Maryland > Baltimore (0.04)
- Texas > Travis County
- Austin (0.27)
- Michigan > Washtenaw County
- Ann Arbor (0.04)
- Minnesota > Hennepin County
- Minneapolis (0.14)
- Louisiana > Orleans Parish
- New Orleans (0.04)
- Ohio
- Clark County > Springfield (0.04)
- Cuyahoga County > Cleveland (0.04)
- North Carolina > Mecklenburg County
- Charlotte (0.04)
- California
- Kern County > Bakersfield (0.04)
- Santa Barbara County > Santa Barbara (0.04)
- San Diego County > San Diego (0.04)
- Los Angeles County
- Los Angeles (0.14)
- Long Beach (0.04)
- New York > New York County
- New York City (0.04)
- Canada > British Columbia
- Europe
- Austria (0.04)
- Spain > Valencian Community
- Valencia Province > Valencia (0.04)
- Italy > Tuscany
- Florence (0.04)
- Ireland > Leinster
- County Dublin > Dublin (0.04)
- Germany
- Berlin (0.04)
- Bavaria > Upper Bavaria
- Munich (0.04)
- France > Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur
- Bouches-du-Rhône > Marseille (0.04)
- Belgium > Brussels-Capital Region
- Brussels (0.04)
- Asia
- China > Hong Kong (0.04)
- Singapore (0.04)
- Indonesia > Bali (0.04)
- Middle East
- Jordan (0.04)
- UAE > Abu Dhabi Emirate
- Abu Dhabi (0.04)
- Israel > Tel Aviv District
- Tel Aviv (0.04)
- Japan
- Kyūshū & Okinawa > Kyūshū
- Miyazaki Prefecture > Miyazaki (0.04)
- Honshū > Chūbu
- Toyama Prefecture > Toyama (0.04)
- Kyūshū & Okinawa > Kyūshū
- Genre:
- Research Report
- New Finding (0.87)
- Experimental Study (0.65)
- Research Report
- Industry:
- Law (1.00)
- Information Technology > Security & Privacy (1.00)
- Government (1.00)
- Education (1.00)
- Leisure & Entertainment > Games (0.92)
- Technology: