A Survey on Cross-domain Recommendation: Taxonomies, Methods, and Future Directions
Zang, Tianzi, Zhu, Yanmin, Liu, Haobing, Zhang, Ruohan, Yu, Jiadi
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Traditional recommendation systems are faced with two long-standing obstacles, namely, data sparsity and cold-start problems, which promote the emergence and development of Cross-Domain Recommendation (CDR). The core idea of CDR is to leverage information collected from other domains to alleviate the two problems in one domain. Over the last decade, many efforts have been engaged for cross-domain recommendation. Recently, with the development of deep learning and neural networks, a large number of methods have emerged. However, there is a limited number of systematic surveys on CDR, especially regarding the latest proposed methods as well as the recommendation scenarios and recommendation tasks they address. In this survey paper, we first proposed a two-level taxonomy of cross-domain recommendation which classifies different recommendation scenarios and recommendation tasks. We then introduce and summarize existing cross-domain recommendation approaches under different recommendation scenarios in a structured manner. We also organize datasets commonly used. We conclude this survey by providing several potential research directions about this field.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Jul-24-2022
- Country:
- South America
- Chile > Santiago Metropolitan Region
- Santiago Province > Santiago (0.04)
- Brazil > Rio de Janeiro
- Rio de Janeiro (0.04)
- Argentina > Pampas
- Buenos Aires F.D. > Buenos Aires (0.04)
- Chile > Santiago Metropolitan Region
- Oceania > Australia
- Victoria > Melbourne (0.14)
- Queensland (0.04)
- Western Australia > Perth (0.04)
- North America
- United States
- Florida
- Palm Beach County > Boca Raton (0.04)
- Orange County > Orlando (0.04)
- Nevada > Clark County
- Las Vegas (0.04)
- Arizona > Maricopa County
- Texas
- Travis County > Austin (0.04)
- Harris County > Houston (0.04)
- Hawaii > Honolulu County
- Honolulu (0.04)
- New Jersey > Atlantic County
- Atlantic City (0.04)
- Illinois > Cook County
- Chicago (0.04)
- Georgia > Fulton County
- Atlanta (0.04)
- Washington > King County
- Bellevue (0.04)
- California
- San Francisco County > San Francisco (0.14)
- San Diego County > San Diego (0.04)
- Napa County (0.04)
- Los Angeles County > Pasadena (0.04)
- Santa Clara County
- Palo Alto (0.04)
- Mountain View (0.04)
- New York > New York County
- New York City (0.04)
- Pennsylvania > Allegheny County
- Pittsburgh (0.04)
- Florida
- Canada
- Quebec > Montreal (0.04)
- Ontario > Toronto (0.04)
- British Columbia > Metro Vancouver Regional District
- Vancouver (0.04)
- United States
- Europe
- Austria > Vienna (0.14)
- Czechia > Prague (0.04)
- Ireland (0.04)
- Sweden > Stockholm
- Stockholm (0.04)
- Netherlands > North Holland
- Amsterdam (0.04)
- Hungary > Budapest
- Budapest (0.04)
- Germany
- Baden-Württemberg > Freiburg (0.04)
- North Rhine-Westphalia > Cologne Region
- Cologne (0.04)
- Spain
- Galicia > A Coruña Province
- Santiago de Compostela (0.04)
- Catalonia
- Barcelona Province > Barcelona (0.04)
- Girona Province > Girona (0.04)
- Galicia > A Coruña Province
- France
- Île-de-France > Paris
- Paris (0.04)
- Hauts-de-France > Nord
- Lille (0.04)
- Île-de-France > Paris
- Italy
- Tuscany > Florence (0.04)
- Piedmont > Turin Province
- Turin (0.04)
- Greece > Ionian Islands
- Corfu (0.04)
- Portugal > Coimbra
- Coimbra (0.04)
- Asia
- Singapore (0.04)
- South Korea (0.04)
- Macao (0.04)
- Middle East > Lebanon (0.04)
- Taiwan > Taiwan Province
- Taipei (0.04)
- Japan > Honshū
- Kantō > Tokyo Metropolis Prefecture > Tokyo (0.28)
- China
- Cambodia > Siem Reap Province
- Siem Reap (0.04)
- South America
- Genre:
- Overview (1.00)
- Industry:
- Information Technology > Security & Privacy (0.45)
- Technology: