Kaleidoscope: In-language Exams for Massively Multilingual Vision Evaluation
Salazar, Israfel, Burda, Manuel Fernández, Islam, Shayekh Bin, Moakhar, Arshia Soltani, Singh, Shivalika, Farestam, Fabian, Romanou, Angelika, Boiko, Danylo, Khullar, Dipika, Zhang, Mike, Krzemiński, Dominik, Novikova, Jekaterina, Shimabucoro, Luísa, Imperial, Joseph Marvin, Maheshwary, Rishabh, Duwal, Sharad, Amayuelas, Alfonso, Rajwal, Swati, Purbey, Jebish, Ruby, Ahmed, Popovič, Nicholas, Suppa, Marek, Wasi, Azmine Toushik, Kadiyala, Ram Mohan Rao, Tsymboi, Olga, Kostritsya, Maksim, Moakhar, Bardia Soltani, Merlin, Gabriel da Costa, Coletti, Otávio Ferracioli, Shiviari, Maral Jabbari, fard, MohammadAmin farahani, Fernandez, Silvia, Grandury, María, Abulkhanov, Dmitry, Sharma, Drishti, De Mitri, Andre Guarnier, Marchezi, Leticia Bossatto, Heydari, Setayesh, Obando-Ceron, Johan, Kohut, Nazar, Ermis, Beyza, Elliott, Desmond, Ferrante, Enzo, Hooker, Sara, Fadaee, Marzieh
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
The evaluation of vision-language models (VLMs) has mainly relied on English-language benchmarks, leaving significant gaps in both multilingual and multicultural coverage. While multilingual benchmarks have expanded, both in size and languages, many rely on translations of English datasets, failing to capture cultural nuances. In this work, we propose Kaleidoscope, as the most comprehensive exam benchmark to date for the multilingual evaluation of vision-language models. Kaleidoscope is a large-scale, in-language multimodal benchmark designed to evaluate VLMs across diverse languages and visual inputs. Kaleidoscope covers 18 languages and 14 different subjects, amounting to a total of 20,911 multiple-choice questions. Built through an open science collaboration with a diverse group of researchers worldwide, Kaleidoscope ensures linguistic and cultural authenticity. We evaluate top-performing multilingual vision-language models and find that they perform poorly on low-resource languages and in complex multimodal scenarios. Our results highlight the need for progress on culturally inclusive multimodal evaluation frameworks.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Apr-30-2025
- Country:
- Africa (0.14)
- Asia
- India > Telangana
- Hyderabad (0.04)
- Indonesia > Bali (0.04)
- Japan (0.04)
- Middle East
- Israel (0.14)
- Jordan (0.14)
- UAE > Abu Dhabi Emirate
- Abu Dhabi (0.14)
- Philippines (0.04)
- Singapore (0.04)
- Southeast Asia (0.04)
- Thailand > Bangkok
- Bangkok (0.04)
- India > Telangana
- Europe
- Belgium > Brussels-Capital Region
- Brussels (0.04)
- Ireland > Leinster
- County Dublin > Dublin (0.04)
- Ukraine
- Kyiv Oblast > Kyiv (0.04)
- Lviv Oblast > Lviv (0.04)
- Monaco (0.04)
- Sweden > Uppsala County
- Uppsala (0.04)
- Denmark
- Capital Region > Copenhagen (0.04)
- North Jutland > Aalborg (0.04)
- Spain
- France > Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur
- Bouches-du-Rhône > Marseille (0.04)
- Germany
- Baden-Württemberg > Karlsruhe Region
- Karlsruhe (0.04)
- Berlin (0.04)
- Saxony > Dresden (0.04)
- Baden-Württemberg > Karlsruhe Region
- Italy > Tuscany
- Florence (0.04)
- Slovakia > Bratislava
- Bratislava (0.04)
- Albania > Tirana County
- Tirana (0.04)
- Switzerland > Zürich
- Zürich (0.04)
- Russia > Central Federal District
- Moscow Oblast > Moscow (0.04)
- Belgium > Brussels-Capital Region
- North America
- Canada
- Central America (0.04)
- Dominican Republic (0.04)
- Mexico > Mexico City
- Mexico City (0.04)
- United States
- California > Santa Barbara County
- Santa Barbara (0.04)
- Florida > Miami-Dade County
- Miami (0.04)
- Louisiana > Orleans Parish
- New Orleans (0.04)
- Minnesota > Hennepin County
- Minneapolis (0.14)
- Oregon > Multnomah County
- Portland (0.04)
- California > Santa Barbara County
- South America
- Argentina > Pampas
- Buenos Aires F.D. > Buenos Aires (0.04)
- Brazil > São Paulo (0.04)
- Chile > Santiago Metropolitan Region
- Santiago Province > Santiago (0.04)
- Colombia > Meta Department
- Villavicencio (0.04)
- Paraguay > Asunción
- Asunción (0.04)
- Argentina > Pampas
- Genre:
- Research Report > New Finding (0.65)
- Industry:
- Education (0.88)
- Health & Medicine (0.92)
- Technology: