Kaleidoscope: In-language Exams for Massively Multilingual Vision Evaluation

Salazar, Israfel, Burda, Manuel Fernández, Islam, Shayekh Bin, Moakhar, Arshia Soltani, Singh, Shivalika, Farestam, Fabian, Romanou, Angelika, Boiko, Danylo, Khullar, Dipika, Zhang, Mike, Krzemiński, Dominik, Novikova, Jekaterina, Shimabucoro, Luísa, Imperial, Joseph Marvin, Maheshwary, Rishabh, Duwal, Sharad, Amayuelas, Alfonso, Rajwal, Swati, Purbey, Jebish, Ruby, Ahmed, Popovič, Nicholas, Suppa, Marek, Wasi, Azmine Toushik, Kadiyala, Ram Mohan Rao, Tsymboi, Olga, Kostritsya, Maksim, Moakhar, Bardia Soltani, Merlin, Gabriel da Costa, Coletti, Otávio Ferracioli, Shiviari, Maral Jabbari, fard, MohammadAmin farahani, Fernandez, Silvia, Grandury, María, Abulkhanov, Dmitry, Sharma, Drishti, De Mitri, Andre Guarnier, Marchezi, Leticia Bossatto, Heydari, Setayesh, Obando-Ceron, Johan, Kohut, Nazar, Ermis, Beyza, Elliott, Desmond, Ferrante, Enzo, Hooker, Sara, Fadaee, Marzieh

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence 

The evaluation of vision-language models (VLMs) has mainly relied on English-language benchmarks, leaving significant gaps in both multilingual and multicultural coverage. While multilingual benchmarks have expanded, both in size and languages, many rely on translations of English datasets, failing to capture cultural nuances. In this work, we propose Kaleidoscope, as the most comprehensive exam benchmark to date for the multilingual evaluation of vision-language models. Kaleidoscope is a large-scale, in-language multimodal benchmark designed to evaluate VLMs across diverse languages and visual inputs. Kaleidoscope covers 18 languages and 14 different subjects, amounting to a total of 20,911 multiple-choice questions. Built through an open science collaboration with a diverse group of researchers worldwide, Kaleidoscope ensures linguistic and cultural authenticity. We evaluate top-performing multilingual vision-language models and find that they perform poorly on low-resource languages and in complex multimodal scenarios. Our results highlight the need for progress on culturally inclusive multimodal evaluation frameworks.