A review of machine learning applications in wildfire science and management
Jain, Piyush, Coogan, Sean C P, Subramanian, Sriram Ganapathi, Crowley, Mark, Taylor, Steve, Flannigan, Mike D
Artificial intelligence has been applied in wildfire science and management since the 1990s, with early applications including neural networks and expert systems. Since then the field has rapidly progressed congruently with the wide adoption of machine learning (ML) in the environmental sciences. Here, we present a scoping review of ML in wildfire science and management. Our objective is to improve awareness of ML among wildfire scientists and managers, as well as illustrate the challenging range of problems in wildfire science available to data scientists. We first present an overview of popular ML approaches used in wildfire science to date, and then review their use in wildfire science within six problem domains: 1) fuels characterization, fire detection, and mapping; 2) fire weather and climate change; 3) fire occurrence, susceptibility, and risk; 4) fire behavior prediction; 5) fire effects; and 6) fire management. We also discuss the advantages and limitations of various ML approaches and identify opportunities for future advances in wildfire science and management within a data science context. We identified 298 relevant publications, where the most frequently used ML methods included random forests, MaxEnt, artificial neural networks, decision trees, support vector machines, and genetic algorithms. There exists opportunities to apply more current ML methods (e.g., deep learning and agent based learning) in wildfire science. However, despite the ability of ML models to learn on their own, expertise in wildfire science is necessary to ensure realistic modelling of fire processes across multiple scales, while the complexity of some ML methods requires sophisticated knowledge for their application. Finally, we stress that the wildfire research and management community plays an active role in providing relevant, high quality data for use by practitioners of ML methods.
Mar-1-2020
- Country:
- South America
- Brazil > Federal District (0.04)
- Argentina > Patagonia
- Río Negro Province > Viedma (0.04)
- Oceania
- New Caledonia (0.04)
- New Zealand (0.04)
- Australia
- Victoria (0.04)
- South Australia (0.04)
- North America
- Puerto Rico (0.04)
- Honduras (0.04)
- Mexico (0.04)
- United States
- Alaska (0.04)
- Nevada (0.04)
- Oregon (0.04)
- Michigan (0.04)
- Rocky Mountains (0.04)
- New Mexico (0.04)
- Nebraska (0.04)
- Utah (0.04)
- North Carolina (0.04)
- Louisiana > East Baton Rouge Parish
- Central (0.04)
- Idaho > Ada County
- Boise (0.04)
- Colorado > Larimer County
- Fort Collins (0.04)
- California
- San Mateo County > San Mateo (0.13)
- San Diego County > San Diego (0.04)
- San Francisco County > San Francisco (0.04)
- San Bernardino County > San Bernardino (0.04)
- New York > New York County
- New York City (0.04)
- Canada
- Rocky Mountains (0.04)
- Quebec (0.04)
- Saskatchewan (0.04)
- Ontario > Waterloo Region
- Waterloo (0.04)
- British Columbia
- Alberta > Census Division No. 11
- Edmonton Metropolitan Region > Edmonton (0.04)
- Europe
- Greece (0.04)
- France (0.04)
- Russia (0.04)
- Serbia (0.04)
- Middle East > Cyprus (0.04)
- Switzerland (0.04)
- Slovenia (0.04)
- Spain
- Catalonia (0.04)
- Galicia > Madrid (0.04)
- Castilla-La Mancha > Guadalajara Province (0.04)
- Andalusia (0.04)
- Valencian Community > Valencia Province
- Valencia (0.04)
- Canary Islands
- Tenerife (0.04)
- Gran Canaria (0.04)
- Italy
- Tuscany (0.04)
- Aosta Valley > Aosta (0.04)
- Sicily (0.04)
- Sardinia (0.04)
- Netherlands > South Holland
- Dordrecht (0.04)
- Portugal > Coimbra
- Coimbra (0.04)
- Asia
- South Korea (0.04)
- Azerbaijan (0.04)
- Cambodia (0.04)
- Japan (0.04)
- Indonesia > Sumatra (0.04)
- East Asia (0.04)
- Mongolia (0.04)
- India > NCT
- New Delhi (0.04)
- Russia > Siberian Federal District
- Irkutsk Oblast > Irkutsk (0.04)
- China
- Fujian Province (0.14)
- Yunnan Province (0.04)
- Guangdong Province > Guangzhou (0.04)
- Tibet Autonomous Region (0.04)
- Jiangxi Province (0.04)
- Anhui Province > Hefei (0.04)
- Middle East
- Republic of Türkiye (0.04)
- Lebanon (0.04)
- Iran
- Mazandaran Province (0.04)
- Golestan Province (0.04)
- Tehran Province > Tehran (0.04)
- Isfahan Province (0.04)
- Vietnam
- Lào Cai Province > Lào Cai (0.04)
- Lâm Đồng Province (0.04)
- Africa
- Southern Africa (0.04)
- Ethiopia (0.04)
- Namibia (0.04)
- Middle East > Tunisia (0.04)
- Eswatini (0.04)
- Sub-Saharan Africa (0.04)
- Mozambique (0.04)
- Zimbabwe (0.04)
- West Africa (0.04)
- South Africa (0.04)
- Sudan (0.04)
- South America
- Genre:
- Overview (1.00)
- Research Report
- New Finding (1.00)
- Experimental Study (0.68)
- Industry:
- Technology:
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence
- Representation & Reasoning
- Agents (1.00)
- Uncertainty
- Fuzzy Logic (1.00)
- Bayesian Inference (1.00)
- Machine Learning
- Neural Networks > Deep Learning (1.00)
- Evolutionary Systems (1.00)
- Ensemble Learning (1.00)
- Decision Tree Learning (1.00)
- Performance Analysis > Accuracy (0.92)
- Statistical Learning
- Support Vector Machines (1.00)
- Regression (1.00)
- Clustering (0.92)
- Learning Graphical Models
- Directed Networks > Bayesian Learning (1.00)
- Undirected Networks > Markov Models (0.67)
- Representation & Reasoning
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence