A review of machine learning applications in wildfire science and management
Jain, Piyush, Coogan, Sean C P, Subramanian, Sriram Ganapathi, Crowley, Mark, Taylor, Steve, Flannigan, Mike D
Artificial intelligence has been applied in wildfire science and management since the 1990s, with early applications including neural networks and expert systems. Since then the field has rapidly progressed congruently with the wide adoption of machine learning (ML) in the environmental sciences. Here, we present a scoping review of ML in wildfire science and management. Our objective is to improve awareness of ML among wildfire scientists and managers, as well as illustrate the challenging range of problems in wildfire science available to data scientists. We first present an overview of popular ML approaches used in wildfire science to date, and then review their use in wildfire science within six problem domains: 1) fuels characterization, fire detection, and mapping; 2) fire weather and climate change; 3) fire occurrence, susceptibility, and risk; 4) fire behavior prediction; 5) fire effects; and 6) fire management. We also discuss the advantages and limitations of various ML approaches and identify opportunities for future advances in wildfire science and management within a data science context. We identified 298 relevant publications, where the most frequently used ML methods included random forests, MaxEnt, artificial neural networks, decision trees, support vector machines, and genetic algorithms. There exists opportunities to apply more current ML methods (e.g., deep learning and agent based learning) in wildfire science. However, despite the ability of ML models to learn on their own, expertise in wildfire science is necessary to ensure realistic modelling of fire processes across multiple scales, while the complexity of some ML methods requires sophisticated knowledge for their application. Finally, we stress that the wildfire research and management community plays an active role in providing relevant, high quality data for use by practitioners of ML methods.
Mar-1-2020
- Country:
- Africa
- Southern Africa (0.04)
- Sub-Saharan Africa (0.04)
- Ethiopia (0.04)
- Sudan (0.04)
- South Africa (0.04)
- West Africa (0.04)
- Eswatini (0.04)
- Namibia (0.04)
- Zimbabwe (0.04)
- Mozambique (0.04)
- Middle East > Tunisia (0.04)
- Asia
- Cambodia (0.04)
- Mongolia (0.04)
- Indonesia > Sumatra (0.04)
- East Asia (0.04)
- Azerbaijan (0.04)
- Vietnam
- Lào Cai Province > Lào Cai (0.04)
- Lâm Đồng Province (0.04)
- Japan (0.04)
- Middle East
- Iran
- Golestan Province (0.04)
- Isfahan Province (0.04)
- Mazandaran Province (0.04)
- Tehran Province > Tehran (0.04)
- Lebanon (0.04)
- Republic of Türkiye (0.04)
- Iran
- China
- Anhui Province > Hefei (0.04)
- Fujian Province (0.14)
- Guangdong Province > Guangzhou (0.04)
- Jiangxi Province (0.04)
- Tibet Autonomous Region (0.04)
- Yunnan Province (0.04)
- South Korea (0.04)
- Russia > Siberian Federal District
- Irkutsk Oblast > Irkutsk (0.04)
- India > NCT
- New Delhi (0.04)
- Europe
- Portugal > Coimbra
- Coimbra (0.04)
- Netherlands > South Holland
- Dordrecht (0.04)
- Greece (0.04)
- Middle East > Cyprus (0.04)
- Russia (0.04)
- Italy
- Aosta Valley > Aosta (0.04)
- Sardinia (0.04)
- Sicily (0.04)
- Tuscany (0.04)
- France (0.04)
- Serbia (0.04)
- Slovenia (0.04)
- Switzerland (0.04)
- Spain
- Andalusia (0.04)
- Canary Islands
- Gran Canaria (0.04)
- Tenerife (0.04)
- Castilla-La Mancha > Guadalajara Province (0.04)
- Catalonia (0.04)
- Galicia > Madrid (0.04)
- Valencian Community > Valencia Province
- Valencia (0.04)
- Portugal > Coimbra
- North America
- Canada
- Alberta > Census Division No. 11
- Edmonton Metropolitan Region > Edmonton (0.04)
- British Columbia
- Ontario > Waterloo Region
- Waterloo (0.04)
- Quebec (0.04)
- Rocky Mountains (0.04)
- Saskatchewan (0.04)
- Alberta > Census Division No. 11
- Honduras (0.04)
- Mexico (0.04)
- Puerto Rico (0.04)
- United States
- New York > New York County
- New York City (0.04)
- California
- San Bernardino County > San Bernardino (0.04)
- San Diego County > San Diego (0.04)
- San Francisco County > San Francisco (0.04)
- San Mateo County > San Mateo (0.13)
- Wyoming (0.04)
- Colorado > Larimer County
- Fort Collins (0.04)
- Nebraska (0.04)
- New Mexico (0.04)
- Rocky Mountains (0.04)
- Michigan (0.04)
- North Carolina (0.04)
- Oregon (0.14)
- Nevada (0.14)
- Utah (0.13)
- Alaska (0.04)
- Idaho > Ada County
- Boise (0.04)
- Louisiana > East Baton Rouge Parish
- Central (0.04)
- New York > New York County
- Canada
- Oceania
- Australia
- South Australia (0.04)
- Victoria (0.04)
- New Caledonia (0.04)
- New Zealand (0.04)
- Australia
- South America
- Argentina > Patagonia
- Río Negro Province > Viedma (0.04)
- Brazil > Federal District (0.04)
- Argentina > Patagonia
- Africa
- Genre:
- Overview (1.00)
- Research Report
- Experimental Study (0.68)
- New Finding (1.00)
- Industry:
- Technology:
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence
- Machine Learning
- Decision Tree Learning (1.00)
- Ensemble Learning (1.00)
- Evolutionary Systems (1.00)
- Learning Graphical Models
- Directed Networks > Bayesian Learning (1.00)
- Undirected Networks > Markov Models (0.67)
- Neural Networks > Deep Learning (1.00)
- Performance Analysis > Accuracy (0.92)
- Statistical Learning
- Clustering (0.92)
- Regression (1.00)
- Support Vector Machines (1.00)
- Representation & Reasoning
- Agents (1.00)
- Uncertainty
- Bayesian Inference (1.00)
- Fuzzy Logic (1.00)
- Machine Learning
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence