The AI Risk Repository: A Comprehensive Meta-Review, Database, and Taxonomy of Risks From Artificial Intelligence
Slattery, Peter, Saeri, Alexander K., Grundy, Emily A. C., Graham, Jess, Noetel, Michael, Uuk, Risto, Dao, James, Pour, Soroush, Casper, Stephen, Thompson, Neil
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
The risks posed by Artificial Intelligence (AI) are of considerable concern to academics, auditors, policymakers, AI companies, and the public. However, a lack of shared understanding of AI risks can impede our ability to comprehensively discuss, research, and react to them. This paper addresses this gap by creating an AI Risk Repository to serve as a common frame of reference. This comprises a living database of 777 risks extracted from 43 taxonomies, which can be filtered based on two overarching taxonomies and easily accessed, modified, and updated via our website and online spreadsheets. We construct our Repository with a systematic review of taxonomies and other structured classifications of AI risk followed by an expert consultation. We develop our taxonomies of AI risk using a best-fit framework synthesis. Our high-level Causal Taxonomy of AI Risks classifies each risk by its causal factors (1) Entity: Human, AI; (2) Intentionality: Intentional, Unintentional; and (3) Timing: Pre-deployment; Post-deployment. Our mid-level Domain Taxonomy of AI Risks classifies risks into seven AI risk domains: (1) Discrimination & toxicity, (2) Privacy & security, (3) Misinformation, (4) Malicious actors & misuse, (5) Human-computer interaction, (6) Socioeconomic & environmental, and (7) AI system safety, failures, & limitations. These are further divided into 23 subdomains. The AI Risk Repository is, to our knowledge, the first attempt to rigorously curate, analyze, and extract AI risk frameworks into a publicly accessible, comprehensive, extensible, and categorized risk database. This creates a foundation for a more coordinated, coherent, and complete approach to defining, auditing, and managing the risks posed by AI systems.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Aug-14-2024
- Country:
- South America > Brazil (0.04)
- Oceania > Australia
- Queensland (0.04)
- North America
- United States
- New York (0.04)
- Massachusetts > Middlesex County
- Cambridge (0.04)
- Illinois > Cook County
- Chicago (0.04)
- Hawaii > Honolulu County
- Honolulu (0.04)
- California > Santa Clara County
- Stanford (0.04)
- Canada > Quebec
- Montreal (0.04)
- United States
- Europe
- Spain (0.04)
- Switzerland (0.04)
- United Kingdom > England
- Nottinghamshire > Nottingham (0.14)
- Oxfordshire > Oxford (0.04)
- Buckinghamshire > Milton Keynes (0.04)
- Portugal > Coimbra
- Coimbra (0.04)
- Netherlands > South Holland
- Rotterdam (0.04)
- Italy > Basilicata
- Potenza Province > Potenza (0.04)
- Germany > Baden-Württemberg
- Stuttgart Region > Stuttgart (0.04)
- Belgium > Flanders
- Flemish Brabant > Leuven (0.04)
- Asia
- Singapore (0.04)
- China > Hong Kong (0.04)
- India (0.04)
- Middle East
- Republic of Türkiye > Karabuk Province
- Karabuk (0.04)
- Iran > Tehran Province
- Tehran (0.04)
- Republic of Türkiye > Karabuk Province
- Africa > Eswatini
- Genre:
- Research Report (1.00)
- Overview (1.00)
- Industry:
- Law Enforcement & Public Safety > Crime Prevention & Enforcement (1.00)
- Information Technology > Security & Privacy (1.00)
- Energy (1.00)
- Law (1.00)
- Health & Medicine > Therapeutic Area (1.00)
- Education (1.00)
- Banking & Finance (0.92)
- Media > News (0.67)
- Government
- Military (1.00)
- Regional Government
- North America Government > United States Government (0.92)
- Europe Government (0.67)
- Technology:
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence
- Representation & Reasoning (1.00)
- Issues > Social & Ethical Issues (1.00)
- Applied AI (1.00)
- Natural Language > Large Language Model (0.94)
- Cognitive Science (0.92)
- Machine Learning > Neural Networks
- Deep Learning > Generative AI (0.46)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence