The Text Anonymization Benchmark (TAB): A Dedicated Corpus and Evaluation Framework for Text Anonymization
Pilán, Ildikó, Lison, Pierre, Øvrelid, Lilja, Papadopoulou, Anthi, Sánchez, David, Batet, Montserrat
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
We present a novel benchmark and associated evaluation metrics for assessing the performance of text anonymization methods. Text anonymization, defined as the task of editing a text document to prevent the disclosure of personal information, currently suffers from a shortage of privacy-oriented annotated text resources, making it difficult to properly evaluate the level of privacy protection offered by various anonymization methods. This paper presents TAB (Text Anonymization Benchmark), a new, open-source annotated corpus developed to address this shortage. The corpus comprises 1,268 English-language court cases from the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) enriched with comprehensive annotations about the personal information appearing in each document, including their semantic category, identifier type, confidential attributes, and co-reference relations. Compared to previous work, the TAB corpus is designed to go beyond traditional de-identification (which is limited to the detection of predefined semantic categories), and explicitly marks which text spans ought to be masked in order to conceal the identity of the person to be protected. Along with presenting the corpus and its annotation layers, we also propose a set of evaluation metrics that are specifically tailored towards measuring the performance of text anonymization, both in terms of privacy protection and utility preservation. We illustrate the use of the benchmark and the proposed metrics by assessing the empirical performance of several baseline text anonymization models. The full corpus along with its privacy-oriented annotation guidelines, evaluation scripts and baseline models are available on: https://github.com/NorskRegnesentral/text-anonymisation-benchmark
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Jan-25-2022
- Country:
- Asia
- China > Hong Kong (0.04)
- India (0.04)
- Japan > Honshū
- Kantō > Tokyo Metropolis Prefecture > Tokyo (0.14)
- Middle East
- Iraq > Kurdistan Region (0.04)
- Republic of Türkiye > Istanbul Province
- Istanbul (0.04)
- Europe
- Czechia > Prague (0.04)
- Ireland (0.04)
- Belgium > Brussels-Capital Region
- Brussels (0.04)
- Middle East > Republic of Türkiye
- Istanbul Province > Istanbul (0.04)
- Sweden
- Stockholm > Stockholm (0.04)
- Vaestra Goetaland > Gothenburg (0.04)
- Norway > Eastern Norway
- Spain > Catalonia (0.04)
- United Kingdom > North Sea
- Central North Sea (0.04)
- France
- Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes > Lyon
- Lyon (0.04)
- Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur > Bouches-du-Rhône
- Marseille (0.04)
- Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes > Lyon
- Greece > Attica
- Athens (0.04)
- Italy > Liguria
- Genoa (0.04)
- Germany (0.04)
- Iceland > Capital Region
- Reykjavik (0.04)
- North America
- Canada (0.04)
- Dominican Republic (0.04)
- Montserrat (0.04)
- United States
- California
- Napa County (0.04)
- San Diego County > San Diego (0.04)
- Minnesota > Hennepin County
- Minneapolis (0.04)
- New York > New York County
- New York City (0.04)
- Pennsylvania > Allegheny County
- Pittsburgh (0.04)
- Texas > Travis County
- Austin (0.04)
- California
- Oceania > Australia
- Asia
- Genre:
- Overview (0.92)
- Industry:
- Government (1.00)
- Health & Medicine > Health Care Technology
- Medical Record (0.68)
- Information Technology > Security & Privacy (1.00)
- Law > Civil Rights & Constitutional Law (1.00)
- Technology:
- Information Technology
- Artificial Intelligence
- Machine Learning
- Neural Networks > Deep Learning (0.92)
- Performance Analysis > Accuracy (0.68)
- Natural Language > Text Processing (1.00)
- Representation & Reasoning (1.00)
- Machine Learning
- Data Science > Data Mining (1.00)
- Security & Privacy (1.00)
- Artificial Intelligence
- Information Technology