Preference Discerning with LLM-Enhanced Generative Retrieval
Paischer, Fabian, Yang, Liu, Liu, Linfeng, Shao, Shuai, Hassani, Kaveh, Li, Jiacheng, Chen, Ricky, Li, Zhang Gabriel, Gao, Xialo, Shao, Wei, Feng, Xue, Noorshams, Nima, Park, Sem, Long, Bo, Eghbalzadeh, Hamid
Sequential recommendation systems aim to provide personalized recommendations for users based on their interaction history. To achieve this, they often incorporate auxiliary information, such as textual descriptions of items and auxiliary tasks, like predicting user preferences and intent. Despite numerous efforts to enhance these models, they still suffer from limited personalization. To address this issue, we propose a new paradigm, which we term preference discerning. In preference dscerning, we explicitly condition a generative sequential recommendation system on user preferences within its context. To this end, we generate user preferences using Large Language Models (LLMs) based on user reviews and item-specific data. To evaluate preference discerning capabilities of sequential recommendation systems, we introduce a novel benchmark that provides a holistic evaluation across various scenarios, including preference steering and sentiment following. We assess current state-of-the-art methods using our benchmark and show that they struggle to accurately discern user preferences. Therefore, we propose a new method named Mender ($\textbf{M}$ultimodal Prefer$\textbf{en}$ce $\textbf{d}$iscern$\textbf{er}$), which improves upon existing methods and achieves state-of-the-art performance on our benchmark. Our results show that Mender can be effectively guided by human preferences even though they have not been observed during training, paving the way toward more personalized sequential recommendation systems. We will open-source the code and benchmarks upon publication.
Dec-11-2024
- Country:
- South America > Colombia
- Meta Department > Villavicencio (0.04)
- North America
- United States
- Maryland > Baltimore (0.04)
- Texas > Harris County
- Houston (0.04)
- Michigan > Washtenaw County
- Ann Arbor (0.04)
- Idaho > Ada County
- Boise (0.04)
- Massachusetts > Suffolk County
- Boston (0.04)
- Louisiana > Orleans Parish
- New Orleans (0.04)
- Wisconsin > Dane County
- Madison (0.04)
- Georgia > Fulton County
- Atlanta (0.04)
- Washington > King County
- Seattle (0.04)
- Alaska > Anchorage Municipality
- Anchorage (0.04)
- California
- San Francisco County > San Francisco (0.14)
- Los Angeles County > Long Beach (0.04)
- Puerto Rico > San Juan
- San Juan (0.04)
- Canada
- Quebec > Montreal (0.04)
- Ontario > Toronto (0.04)
- British Columbia > Metro Vancouver Regional District
- Vancouver (0.14)
- United States
- Europe
- Italy (0.04)
- United Kingdom > England
- Greater London > London (0.04)
- Spain > Galicia
- Madrid (0.04)
- Ireland > Leinster
- County Dublin > Dublin (0.04)
- France > Île-de-France
- Austria > Upper Austria
- Linz (0.04)
- Asia
- Macao (0.04)
- Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- Singapore > Central Region
- Singapore (0.04)
- Myanmar > Tanintharyi Region
- Dawei (0.04)
- China
- South America > Colombia
- Genre:
- Research Report > New Finding (1.00)
- Technology: