Political-LLM: Large Language Models in Political Science
Li, Lincan, Li, Jiaqi, Chen, Catherine, Gui, Fred, Yang, Hongjia, Yu, Chenxiao, Wang, Zhengguang, Cai, Jianing, Zhou, Junlong Aaron, Shen, Bolin, Qian, Alex, Chen, Weixin, Xue, Zhongkai, Sun, Lichao, He, Lifang, Chen, Hanjie, Ding, Kaize, Du, Zijian, Mu, Fangzhou, Pei, Jiaxin, Zhao, Jieyu, Swayamdipta, Swabha, Neiswanger, Willie, Wei, Hua, Hu, Xiyang, Zhu, Shixiang, Chen, Tianlong, Lu, Yingzhou, Shi, Yang, Qin, Lianhui, Fu, Tianfan, Tu, Zhengzhong, Yang, Yuzhe, Yoo, Jaemin, Zhang, Jiaheng, Rossi, Ryan, Zhan, Liang, Zhao, Liang, Ferrara, Emilio, Liu, Yan, Huang, Furong, Zhang, Xiangliang, Rothenberg, Lawrence, Ji, Shuiwang, Yu, Philip S., Zhao, Yue, Dong, Yushun
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
In recent years, large language models (LLMs) have been widely adopted in political science tasks such as election prediction, sentiment analysis, policy impact assessment, and misinformation detection. Meanwhile, the need to systematically understand how LLMs can further revolutionize the field also becomes urgent. In this work, we--a multidisciplinary team of researchers spanning computer science and political science--present the first principled framework termed Political-LLM to advance the comprehensive understanding of integrating LLMs into computational political science. Specifically, we first introduce a fundamental taxonomy classifying the existing explorations into two perspectives: political science and computational methodologies. In particular, from the political science perspective, we highlight the role of LLMs in automating predictive and generative tasks, simulating behavior dynamics, and improving causal inference through tools like counterfactual generation; from a computational perspective, we introduce advancements in data preparation, fine-tuning, and evaluation methods for LLMs that are tailored to political contexts. We identify key challenges and future directions, emphasizing the development of domain-specific datasets, addressing issues of bias and fairness, incorporating human expertise, and redefining evaluation criteria to align with the unique requirements of computational political science. Political-LLM seeks to serve as a guidebook for researchers to foster an informed, ethical, and impactful use of Artificial Intelligence in political science. Our online resource is available at: http://political-llm.org/. Corresponding authors: Yushun Dong (yd24f@fsu.edu) is with the Department of Computer Science, Florida State University; Yue Zhao (yzhao010@usc.edu) is with the Department of Computer Science, University of Southern California; Fred Gui (pgui@lsu.edu) is with the Department of Political Science, Louisiana State University; Catherine Chen (catherinechen@lsu.edu) is with the Manship School of Mass Communication and the Department of Political Science, Louisiana State University.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Dec-9-2024
- Country:
- South America > Chile (0.04)
- Pacific Ocean > North Pacific Ocean
- Puget Sound (0.04)
- Oceania > New Zealand
- North Island > Waikato > Hamilton (0.04)
- North America > United States
- Pennsylvania (0.04)
- Michigan (0.04)
- Utah (0.04)
- Texas (0.04)
- Arizona (0.04)
- Maryland (0.04)
- North Carolina (0.04)
- Virginia (0.04)
- Louisiana > East Baton Rouge Parish
- Baton Rouge (0.44)
- Illinois > Cook County
- Chicago (0.04)
- Wisconsin > Dane County
- Madison (0.04)
- Washington > King County
- Seattle (0.04)
- California
- Los Angeles County > Los Angeles (0.14)
- San Diego County > San Diego (0.04)
- New York > New York County
- New York City (0.04)
- Europe
- Germany (0.27)
- Italy (0.04)
- United Kingdom > England
- Oxfordshire > Oxford (0.04)
- Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Ukraine > Kyiv Oblast
- Kyiv (0.04)
- Netherlands > South Holland
- Delft (0.04)
- Asia
- Indonesia (0.04)
- Singapore (0.04)
- Myanmar > Tanintharyi Region
- Dawei (0.04)
- Middle East > Iran
- Tehran Province > Tehran (0.04)
- Genre:
- Questionnaire & Opinion Survey (1.00)
- Overview (1.00)
- Workflow (0.92)
- Research Report
- New Finding (1.00)
- Experimental Study (1.00)
- Industry:
- Media > News (1.00)
- Law > Statutes (1.00)
- Health & Medicine (1.00)
- Information Technology (0.92)
- Banking & Finance > Economy (0.92)
- Education > Educational Setting (0.87)
- Government
- Technology: