Evaluating Frontier Models for Dangerous Capabilities

Phuong, Mary, Aitchison, Matthew, Catt, Elliot, Cogan, Sarah, Kaskasoli, Alexandre, Krakovna, Victoria, Lindner, David, Rahtz, Matthew, Assael, Yannis, Hodkinson, Sarah, Howard, Heidi, Lieberum, Tom, Kumar, Ramana, Raad, Maria Abi, Webson, Albert, Ho, Lewis, Lin, Sharon, Farquhar, Sebastian, Hutter, Marcus, Deletang, Gregoire, Ruoss, Anian, El-Sayed, Seliem, Brown, Sasha, Dragan, Anca, Shah, Rohin, Dafoe, Allan, Shevlane, Toby

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence 

To understand the risks posed by a new AI system, we must understand what it can and cannot do. Building on prior work, we introduce a programme of new "dangerous capability" evaluations and pilot them on Gemini 1.0 models. Our evaluations cover four areas: (1) persuasion and deception; (2) cyber-security; (3) self-proliferation; and (4) self-reasoning. We do not find evidence of strong dangerous capabilities in the models we evaluated, but we flag early warning signs. Our goal is to help advance a rigorous science of dangerous capability evaluation, in preparation for future models.

Duplicate Docs Excel Report

Title
None found

Similar Docs  Excel Report  more

TitleSimilaritySource
None found