Interpretable Deep Learning: Interpretation, Interpretability, Trustworthiness, and Beyond
Li, Xuhong, Xiong, Haoyi, Li, Xingjian, Wu, Xuanyu, Zhang, Xiao, Liu, Ji, Bian, Jiang, Dou, Dejing
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Deep neural networks have been well-known for their superb handling of various machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks. However, due to their over-parameterized black-box nature, it is often difficult to understand the prediction results of deep models. In recent years, many interpretation tools have been proposed to explain or reveal how deep models make decisions. In this paper, we review this line of research and try to make a comprehensive survey. Specifically, we first introduce and clarify two basic concepts -- interpretations and interpretability -- that people usually get confused about. To address the research efforts in interpretations, we elaborate the designs of a number of interpretation algorithms, from different perspectives, by proposing a new taxonomy. Then, to understand the interpretation results, we also survey the performance metrics for evaluating interpretation algorithms. Further, we summarize the current works in evaluating models' interpretability using "trustworthy" interpretation algorithms. Finally, we review and discuss the connections between deep models' interpretations and other factors, such as adversarial robustness and learning from interpretations, and we introduce several open-source libraries for interpretation algorithms and evaluation approaches.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Jul-15-2022
- Country:
- South America > Chile
- Oceania > Australia
- New South Wales > Sydney (0.04)
- Western Australia > Perth (0.04)
- Victoria > Melbourne (0.04)
- North America
- United States
- Minnesota > Hennepin County
- Minneapolis (0.14)
- Nevada > Clark County
- Las Vegas (0.04)
- Oregon > Lane County
- Eugene (0.14)
- Massachusetts > Suffolk County
- Boston (0.04)
- Hawaii > Honolulu County
- Honolulu (0.04)
- Louisiana > Orleans Parish
- New Orleans (0.05)
- Pennsylvania > Philadelphia County
- Philadelphia (0.14)
- Utah > Salt Lake County
- Salt Lake City (0.04)
- Illinois > Cook County
- Chicago (0.04)
- Florida > Miami-Dade County
- North Miami Beach (0.04)
- Miami Beach (0.04)
- Miami (0.04)
- Washington > King County
- Seattle (0.04)
- Alaska > Anchorage Municipality
- Anchorage (0.04)
- California
- Los Angeles County > Long Beach (0.14)
- San Francisco County > San Francisco (0.14)
- New York > New York County
- New York City (0.04)
- Minnesota > Hennepin County
- Canada
- Quebec > Montreal (0.04)
- British Columbia > Metro Vancouver Regional District
- Vancouver (0.05)
- Alberta > Census Division No. 15
- Improvement District No. 9 > Banff (0.04)
- United States
- Europe
- Austria (0.04)
- Sweden > Stockholm
- Stockholm (0.04)
- Germany > Bavaria
- Lower Franconia > Würzburg (0.04)
- Upper Bavaria > Munich (0.04)
- Spain
- Catalonia > Barcelona Province
- Barcelona (0.04)
- Andalusia > Granada Province
- Granada (0.04)
- Catalonia > Barcelona Province
- Denmark > Capital Region
- Copenhagen (0.04)
- United Kingdom > England
- Tyne and Wear > Newcastle (0.04)
- France
- Île-de-France > Paris
- Paris (0.04)
- Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes > Lyon
- Lyon (0.04)
- Île-de-France > Paris
- Italy
- Belgium > Flanders
- East Flanders > Ghent (0.04)
- Ireland > Leinster
- County Dublin > Dublin (0.04)
- Asia
- Singapore (0.04)
- South Korea > Seoul
- Seoul (0.04)
- Myanmar > Tanintharyi Region
- Dawei (0.04)
- China > Beijing
- Beijing (0.04)
- Africa > Ethiopia
- Addis Ababa > Addis Ababa (0.04)
- Genre:
- Research Report (1.00)
- Overview (1.00)
- Industry:
- Information Technology (0.92)
- Health & Medicine
- Diagnostic Medicine > Imaging (0.67)
- Therapeutic Area > Neurology (0.45)
- Technology: