Register Variation Remains Stable Across 60 Languages

This paper measures the stability of cross-linguistic register variation. A register is a variety of a language that is associated with extra-linguistic context. The relationship between a register and its context is functional: the linguistic features that make up a register are motivated by the needs and constraints of the communicative situation. This view hypothesizes that register should be universal, so that we expect a stable relationship between the extra-linguistic context that defines a register and the sets of linguistic features which the register contains. In this paper, the universality and robustness of register variation is tested by comparing variation within vs. between registerspecific corpora in 60 languages using corpora produced in comparable communicative situations: tweets and Wikipedia articles. Our findings confirm the prediction that register variation is, in fact, universal. A variety of a language is a combination of linguistic features that co-vary together: for example, past tenses and third person pronouns, nouns and determiners. A register can be defined as a variety of a language that is associated with a specific context of production (Biber and Conrad 2009). In this way, registers contrast with other types of varieties, such as dialects or sociolects, which are instead associated with social factors. The relationship between a register and its context is functional in nature: for example, the features of a particular register are used because they respond to the constraints and needs of that situation. For example, the past tense and third person pronouns are tools we need to construct a narrative and their usage therefore correlates with situations in which one of the purposes is to narrate (e.g. a fictional novel but also a biography). In the same way, nominalisations and the passive voice can be useful to remove agency from a text, thus being quite useful in scientific and academic prose. This deep connection between a register and its context means that both need to be described in order to carry out a register analysis. The language of the register is described by referring to linguistic features, which tend to be lexicogrammatical items. And the context of production tends to be described through an analysis of its contextual configuration, for example using Situational Parameters (Biber 1994; Biber and Conrad 2009), a taxonomy of those aspects of an extra-linguistic context that are known to influence language use. For example, these situational parameters describe distinctions between written and spoken usage, the relationship between addresser and addressee, and the purpose of the text. We begin by briefly defining some key terms that will be used throughout this paper. First, context of production and communicative situation refer to the non-linguistic attributes of the environment in which a corpus was created.