CertPri: Certifiable Prioritization for Deep Neural Networks via Movement Cost in Feature Space
Zheng, Haibin, Chen, Jinyin, Jin, Haibo
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Deep neural networks (DNNs) have demonstrated their outperformance in various software systems, but also exhibit misbehavior and even result in irreversible disasters. Therefore, it is crucial to identify the misbehavior of DNN-based software and improve DNNs' quality. Test input prioritization is one of the most appealing ways to guarantee DNNs' quality, which prioritizes test inputs so that more bug-revealing inputs can be identified earlier with limited time and manual labeling efforts. However, the existing prioritization methods are still limited from three aspects: certifiability, effectiveness, and generalizability. To overcome the challenges, we propose CertPri, a test input prioritization technique designed based on a movement cost perspective of test inputs in DNNs' feature space. CertPri differs from previous works in three key aspects: (1) certifiable: it provides a formal robustness guarantee for the movement cost; (2) effective: it leverages formally guaranteed movement costs to identify malicious bug-revealing inputs; and (3) generic: it can be applied to various tasks, data, models, and scenarios. Extensive evaluations across 2 tasks (i.e., classification and regression), 6 data forms, 4 model structures, and 2 scenarios (i.e., white-box and black-box) demonstrate CertPri's superior performance. For instance, it significantly improves 53.97% prioritization effectiveness on average compared with baselines. Its robustness and generalizability are 1.41~2.00 times and 1.33~3.39 times that of baselines on average, respectively.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Jul-18-2023
- Country:
- Oceania > Australia
- North America
- United States
- Utah > Salt Lake County
- Salt Lake City (0.04)
- Texas
- Travis County > Austin (0.04)
- Dallas County > Dallas (0.04)
- Oregon > Multnomah County
- Portland (0.04)
- New York > New York County
- New York City (0.04)
- Nevada > Clark County
- Las Vegas (0.04)
- Michigan > Oakland County
- Rochester (0.04)
- Colorado > Denver County
- Denver (0.04)
- California
- Los Angeles County > Long Beach (0.14)
- San Diego County > San Diego (0.04)
- Santa Clara County > San Jose (0.04)
- San Mateo County > Menlo Park (0.04)
- Utah > Salt Lake County
- Canada
- Ontario > Toronto (0.14)
- Quebec > Montreal (0.04)
- British Columbia > Metro Vancouver Regional District
- Vancouver (0.04)
- United States
- Europe
- Czechia > Prague (0.04)
- Sweden > Vaestra Goetaland
- Gothenburg (0.04)
- Spain > Galicia
- Madrid (0.04)
- Greece > Central Macedonia
- Thessaloniki (0.04)
- France
- Occitanie > Hérault
- Montpellier (0.04)
- Hauts-de-France > Nord
- Lille (0.04)
- Occitanie > Hérault
- Asia
- South Korea > Seoul
- Seoul (0.04)
- China
- Zhejiang Province > Hangzhou (0.04)
- Beijing > Beijing (0.04)
- South Korea > Seoul
- Genre:
- Research Report (1.00)
- Industry:
- Information Technology > Security & Privacy (0.46)
- Transportation > Ground
- Road (0.46)
- Technology: