Tackling Noisy Clients in Federated Learning with End-to-end Label Correction
Jiang, Xuefeng, Sun, Sheng, Li, Jia, Xue, Jingjing, Li, Runhan, Wu, Zhiyuan, Xu, Gang, Wang, Yuwei, Liu, Min
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Recently, federated learning (FL) has achieved wide successes for diverse privacy-sensitive applications without sacrificing the sensitive private information of clients. However, the data quality of client datasets can not be guaranteed since corresponding annotations of different clients often contain complex label noise of varying degrees, which inevitably causes the performance degradation. Intuitively, the performance degradation is dominated by clients with higher noise rates since their trained models contain more misinformation from data, thus it is necessary to devise an effective optimization scheme to mitigate the negative impacts of these noisy clients. In this work, we propose a two-stage framework FedELC to tackle this complicated label noise issue. The first stage aims to guide the detection of noisy clients with higher label noise, while the second stage aims to correct the labels of noisy clients' data via an end-to-end label correction framework which is achieved by learning possible ground-truth labels of noisy clients' datasets via back propagation. We implement sixteen related methods and evaluate five datasets with three types of complicated label noise scenarios for a comprehensive comparison. Extensive experimental results demonstrate our proposed framework achieves superior performance than its counterparts for different scenarios. Additionally, we effectively improve the data quality of detected noisy clients' local datasets with our label correction framework. The code is available at https://github.com/Sprinter1999/FedELC.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Aug-8-2024
- Country:
- Oceania > Australia
- New South Wales > Sydney (0.04)
- North America
- United States
- Virginia (0.04)
- District of Columbia > Washington (0.04)
- Texas > Travis County
- Austin (0.04)
- Idaho > Ada County
- Boise (0.05)
- Florida
- Pinellas County > St. Petersburg (0.04)
- Broward County > Fort Lauderdale (0.04)
- Nevada > Clark County
- Las Vegas (0.04)
- Massachusetts > Suffolk County
- Boston (0.04)
- Hawaii > Honolulu County
- Honolulu (0.04)
- Louisiana > Orleans Parish
- New Orleans (0.04)
- Utah > Salt Lake County
- Salt Lake City (0.04)
- California > Los Angeles County
- Long Beach (0.14)
- Georgia > Fulton County
- Atlanta (0.04)
- New York > New York County
- New York City (0.04)
- Canada
- Quebec > Montreal (0.04)
- British Columbia > Metro Vancouver Regional District
- Vancouver (0.04)
- United States
- Europe
- Austria (0.04)
- Sweden > Stockholm
- Stockholm (0.04)
- Slovenia > Central Slovenia
- Municipality of Ljubljana > Ljubljana (0.04)
- Asia
- Macao (0.04)
- South Korea > Seoul
- Seoul (0.04)
- Malaysia > Kuala Lumpur
- Kuala Lumpur (0.04)
- India > Karnataka
- Bengaluru (0.04)
- China > Beijing
- Beijing (0.04)
- Africa
- Rwanda > Kigali
- Kigali (0.04)
- Ethiopia > Addis Ababa
- Addis Ababa (0.04)
- Rwanda > Kigali
- Oceania > Australia
- Genre:
- Research Report > New Finding (0.66)
- Industry:
- Education (0.68)
- Information Technology > Security & Privacy (0.46)
- Technology: