LongProc: Benchmarking Long-Context Language Models on Long Procedural Generation
Ye, Xi, Yin, Fangcong, He, Yinghui, Zhang, Joie, Yen, Howard, Gao, Tianyu, Durrett, Greg, Chen, Danqi
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Existing benchmarks for evaluating long-context language models (LCLMs) primarily focus on long-context recall, requiring models to produce short responses based on a few critical snippets while processing thousands of irrelevant tokens. We introduce LongProc (Long Procedural Generation), a new benchmark that requires both the integration of highly dispersed information and long-form generation. LongProc consists of six diverse procedural generation tasks, such as extracting structured information from HTML pages into a TSV format and executing complex search procedures to create travel plans. These tasks challenge LCLMs by testing their ability to follow detailed procedural instructions, synthesize and reason over dispersed information, and generate structured, long-form outputs (up to 8K tokens). Furthermore, as these tasks adhere to deterministic procedures and yield structured outputs, they enable reliable rule-based evaluation. We evaluate 17 LCLMs on LongProc across three difficulty levels, with maximum numbers of output tokens set at 500, 2K, and 8K. Notably, while all tested models claim a context window size above 32K tokens, open-weight models typically falter on 2K-token tasks, and closed-source models like GPT-4o show significant degradation on 8K-token tasks. Further analysis reveals that LCLMs struggle to maintain long-range coherence in long-form generations. These findings highlight critical limitations in current LCLMs and suggest substantial room for improvement. Data and code available at: https://princeton-pli.github.io/LongProc
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Jan-9-2025
- Country:
- South America > Chile
- North America
- United States
- Texas
- Tarrant County > Fort Worth (0.04)
- Travis County > Austin (0.04)
- Indiana > Marion County
- Indianapolis (0.04)
- Illinois > Will County
- Naperville (0.04)
- Colorado > El Paso County
- Colorado Springs (0.04)
- California > Los Angeles County
- Beverly Hills (0.05)
- Los Angeles > Hollywood
- West Hollywood (0.04)
- Texas
- Canada
- United States
- Europe
- Czechia > Prague (0.04)
- Sweden > Stockholm
- Stockholm (0.05)
- Lithuania > Vilnius County
- Vilnius (0.04)
- Switzerland > Zürich
- Zürich (0.04)
- Latvia > Riga Municipality
- Riga (0.04)
- Iceland > Capital Region
- Reykjavik (0.05)
- Hungary > Budapest
- Budapest (0.04)
- Germany
- Thuringia > Erfurt (0.04)
- Bavaria > Upper Bavaria
- Munich (0.05)
- Baden-Württemberg > Stuttgart Region
- Stuttgart (0.05)
- Romania > Vest Development Region
- Timiș County > Timișoara (0.04)
- Portugal > Lisbon
- Lisbon (0.04)
- Russia > North Caucasian Federal District
- Finland > Uusimaa
- Helsinki (0.04)
- United Kingdom
- Wales > Monmouthshire (0.04)
- England
- Dorset > Bournemouth (0.04)
- Surrey > Guildford (0.04)
- West Sussex (0.04)
- Nottinghamshire (0.04)
- Lincolnshire (0.04)
- Poland > Lesser Poland Province
- Kraków (0.04)
- Estonia > Harju County
- Tallinn (0.04)
- Asia
- Russia > Far Eastern Federal District
- Primorsky Krai > Vladivostok (0.04)
- Myanmar > Tanintharyi Region
- Dawei (0.04)
- China
- Hong Kong (0.04)
- Guangxi Province > Nanning (0.04)
- Russia > Far Eastern Federal District
- Genre:
- Research Report (1.00)
- Industry:
- Consumer Products & Services > Travel (0.69)
- Technology: