Differentially Private Speaker Anonymization
Shamsabadi, Ali Shahin, Srivastava, Brij Mohan Lal, Bellet, Aurélien, Vauquier, Nathalie, Vincent, Emmanuel, Maouche, Mohamed, Tommasi, Marc, Papernot, Nicolas
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Sharing real-world speech utterances is key to the training and deployment of voice-based services. However, it also raises privacy risks as speech contains a wealth of personal data. Speaker anonymization aims to remove speaker information from a speech utterance while leaving its linguistic and prosodic attributes intact. State-of-the-art techniques operate by disentangling the speaker information (represented via a speaker embedding) from these attributes and re-synthesizing speech based on the speaker embedding of another speaker. Prior research in the privacy community has shown that anonymization often provides brittle privacy protection, even less so any provable guarantee. In this work, we show that disentanglement is indeed not perfect: linguistic and prosodic attributes still contain speaker information. We remove speaker information from these attributes by introducing differentially private feature extractors based on an autoencoder and an automatic speech recognizer, respectively, trained using noise layers. We plug these extractors in the state-of-the-art anonymization pipeline and generate, for the first time, private speech utterances with a provable upper bound on the speaker information they contain. We evaluate empirically the privacy and utility resulting from our differentially private speaker anonymization approach on the LibriSpeech data set. Experimental results show that the generated utterances retain very high utility for automatic speech recognition training and inference, while being much better protected against strong adversaries who leverage the full knowledge of the anonymization process to try to infer the speaker identity.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Oct-6-2022
- Country:
- Oceania
- New Zealand > North Island
- Auckland Region > Auckland (0.04)
- Australia > Queensland
- Brisbane (0.04)
- New Zealand > North Island
- North America
- United States
- Texas > Harris County
- Houston (0.04)
- New York
- New York County > New York City (0.14)
- Richmond County > New York City (0.04)
- Queens County > New York City (0.04)
- Kings County > New York City (0.04)
- Bronx County > New York City (0.04)
- Florida > Orange County
- Orlando (0.04)
- California
- San Francisco County > San Francisco (0.14)
- San Diego County > San Diego (0.04)
- Santa Barbara County > Santa Barbara (0.04)
- Texas > Harris County
- Canada
- United States
- Europe
- Netherlands (0.04)
- Croatia (0.04)
- Austria
- Slovenia > Central Slovenia
- Municipality of Ljubljana > Ljubljana (0.04)
- United Kingdom > England
- Greater London > London (0.04)
- France
- Hauts-de-France > Nord
- Lille (0.04)
- Grand Est > Meurthe-et-Moselle
- Nancy (0.04)
- Hauts-de-France > Nord
- Italy
- Tuscany > Florence (0.04)
- Calabria > Catanzaro Province
- Catanzaro (0.04)
- Spain > Catalonia
- Barcelona Province > Barcelona (0.04)
- Czechia
- South Moravian Region > Brno (0.04)
- Olomouc Region > Olomouc (0.04)
- Asia
- Oceania
- Genre:
- Research Report > New Finding (0.66)
- Industry:
- Information Technology > Security & Privacy (1.00)
- Technology: