Ethics of AI: Benefits and risks of artificial intelligence
In 1949, at the dawn of the computer age, the French philosopher Gabriel Marcel warned of the danger of naively applying technology to solve life's problems. Life, Marcel wrote in Being and Having, cannot be fixed the way you fix a flat tire. Any fix, any technique, is itself a product of that same problematic world, and is therefore problematic, and compromised. Marcel's admonition is often summarized in a single memorable phrase: "Life is not a problem to be solved, but a mystery to be lived." Despite that warning, seventy years later, artificial intelligence is the most powerful expression yet of humans' urge to solve or improve upon human life with computers. But what are these computer systems? As Marcel would have urged, one must ask where they come from, whether they embody the very problems they would purport to solve. Ethics in AI is essentially questioning, constantly investigating, and never taking for granted the technologies that are being rapidly imposed upon human life. That questioning is made all the more urgent because of scale. AI systems are reaching tremendous size in terms of the compute power they require, and the data they consume. And their prevalence in society, both in the scale of their deployment and the level of responsibility they assume, dwarfs the presence of computing in the PC and Internet eras. At the same time, increasing scale means many aspects of the technology, especially in its deep learning form, escape the comprehension of even the most experienced practitioners. Ethical concerns range from the esoteric, such as who is the author of an AI-created work of art; to the very real and very disturbing matter of surveillance in the hands of military authorities who can use the tools with impunity to capture and kill their fellow citizens. Somewhere in the questioning is a sliver of hope that with the right guidance, AI can help solve some of the world's biggest problems. The same technology that may propel bias can reveal bias in hiring decisions. The same technology that is a power hog can potentially contribute answers to slow or even reverse global warming. The risks of AI at the present moment arguably outweigh the benefits, but the potential benefits are large and worth pursuing. As Margaret Mitchell, formerly co-lead of Ethical AI at Google, has elegantly encapsulated, the key question is, "what could AI do to bring about a better society?" Mitchell's question would be interesting on any given day, but it comes within a context that has added urgency to the discussion. Mitchell's words come from a letter she wrote and posted on Google Drive following the departure of her co-lead, Timnit Gebru, in December.
Apr-30-2021, 12:00:30 GMT
- Country:
- Africa > Sudan (0.14)
- Asia
- Europe
- Holy See (0.04)
- Switzerland > Zürich
- Zürich (0.04)
- United Kingdom > England
- Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Indian Ocean > Arabian Sea (0.04)
- North America
- Canada > Quebec
- Montreal (0.05)
- United States
- California > San Diego County
- San Diego (0.04)
- Texas (0.04)
- Utah > Salt Lake County
- Salt Lake City (0.04)
- California > San Diego County
- Canada > Quebec
- Genre:
- Research Report
- Experimental Study (0.93)
- New Finding (1.00)
- Research Report
- Industry:
- Automobiles & Trucks (1.00)
- Education (0.94)
- Government > Regional Government (1.00)
- Health & Medicine > Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology (1.00)
- Information Technology
- Security & Privacy (1.00)
- Services (1.00)
- Law (1.00)
- Media > News (1.00)
- Transportation > Ground
- Road (1.00)
- Technology: