Tactic Learning and Proving for the Coq Proof Assistant
Blaauwbroek, Lasse, Urban, Josef, Geuvers, Herman
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
We present a system that utilizes machine learning for tactic proof search in the Coq Proof Assistant. In a similar vein as the TacticToe project for HOL4, our system predicts appropriate tactics and finds proofs in the form of tactic scripts. To do this, it learns from previous tactic scripts and how they are applied to proof states. The performance of the system is evaluated on the Coq Standard Library. Currently, our predictor can identify the correct tactic to be applied to a proof state 23.4% of the time. Our proof searcher can fully automatically prove 39.3% of the lemmas. When combined with the CoqHammer system, the two systems together prove 56.7% of the library's lemmas.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Mar-20-2020
- Country:
- Africa
- Botswana > North-West District
- Maun (0.04)
- La Réunion (0.04)
- South Africa (0.04)
- Botswana > North-West District
- Asia > Japan
- Honshū > Kantō > Chiba Prefecture > Chiba (0.04)
- Europe
- Portugal (0.04)
- Czechia > Prague (0.04)
- United Kingdom
- England > Greater London
- London (0.04)
- North Sea > Central North Sea (0.04)
- Scotland > City of Edinburgh
- Edinburgh (0.04)
- England > Greater London
- Italy > Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol
- Trentino Province > Trento (0.04)
- France (0.04)
- Switzerland > Bern
- Bern (0.04)
- Netherlands
- Gelderland > Nijmegen (0.04)
- North Brabant > Eindhoven (0.04)
- Germany
- Hungary > Budapest
- Budapest (0.04)
- Austria (0.04)
- North America
- Canada > Quebec
- Montreal (0.04)
- United States
- California > Los Angeles County
- Long Beach (0.04)
- Louisiana > Orleans Parish
- New Orleans (0.04)
- California > Los Angeles County
- Canada > Quebec
- Oceania > Fiji
- Central Division > Suva (0.04)
- South America > Brazil
- Rio Grande do Norte > Natal (0.04)
- Africa
- Genre:
- Research Report (0.40)
- Technology: