Formulation Comparison for Timeline Construction using LLMs
Hasegawa, Kimihiro, Kandukuri, Nikhil, Holm, Susan, Yamakawa, Yukari, Mitamura, Teruko
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Constructing a timeline requires identifying the chronological order of events in an article. In prior timeline construction datasets, temporal orders are typically annotated by either event-to-time anchoring or event-to-event pairwise ordering, both of which suffer from missing temporal information. To mitigate the issue, we develop a new evaluation dataset, TimeSET, consisting of single-document timelines with document-level order annotation. TimeSET features saliency-based event selection and partial ordering, which enable a practical annotation workload. Aiming to build better automatic timeline construction systems, we propose a novel evaluation framework to compare multiple task formulations with TimeSET by prompting open LLMs, i.e., Llama 2 and Flan-T5. Considering that identifying temporal orders of events is a core subtask in timeline construction, we further benchmark open LLMs on existing event temporal ordering datasets to gain a robust understanding of their capabilities. Our experiments show that (1) NLI formulation with Flan-T5 demonstrates a strong performance among others, while (2) timeline construction and event temporal ordering are still challenging tasks for few-shot LLMs. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/kimihiroh/timeset.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Mar-1-2024
- Country:
- Oceania > Australia
- North America
- Dominican Republic (0.04)
- United States
- Texas > Harris County (0.04)
- Maryland > Baltimore (0.04)
- Oregon (0.04)
- California > San Diego County
- San Diego (0.04)
- Colorado > Denver County
- Denver (0.04)
- Hawaii > Honolulu County
- Honolulu (0.04)
- Louisiana > Orleans Parish
- New Orleans (0.04)
- Washington > King County
- Seattle (0.04)
- New York > New York County
- New York City (0.04)
- Pennsylvania > Allegheny County
- Pittsburgh (0.04)
- Canada
- Ontario > Toronto (0.05)
- British Columbia > Metro Vancouver Regional District
- Vancouver (0.04)
- Europe
- Germany > Berlin (0.04)
- Spain (0.04)
- Slovenia (0.04)
- France (0.04)
- Kosovo (0.04)
- Sweden > Stockholm
- Stockholm (0.04)
- Italy > Tuscany
- Florence (0.04)
- United Kingdom > England
- Lancashire > Lancaster (0.04)
- Middle East > Republic of Türkiye
- Istanbul Province > Istanbul (0.04)
- Croatia > Dubrovnik-Neretva County
- Dubrovnik (0.04)
- Belgium > Brussels-Capital Region
- Brussels (0.04)
- Asia
- Singapore (0.04)
- China > Hong Kong (0.04)
- Middle East
- UAE > Abu Dhabi Emirate
- Abu Dhabi (0.04)
- Republic of Türkiye > Istanbul Province
- Istanbul (0.04)
- UAE > Abu Dhabi Emirate
- Genre:
- Research Report > New Finding (0.68)
- Industry:
- Technology: