Less or More: Towards Glanceable Explanations for LLM Recommendations Using Ultra-Small Devices
Wang, Xinru, Yu, Mengjie, Nguyen, Hannah, Iuzzolino, Michael, Wang, Tianyi, Tang, Peiqi, Lynova, Natasha, Tran, Co, Zhang, Ting, Sendhilnathan, Naveen, Benko, Hrvoje, Xia, Haijun, Jonker, Tanya
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable potential in recommending everyday actions as personal AI assistants, while Explainable AI (XAI) techniques are being increasingly utilized to help users understand why a recommendation is given. Personal AI assistants today are often located on ultra-small devices such as smartwatches, which have limited screen space. The verbosity of LLM-generated explanations, however, makes it challenging to deliver glanceable LLM explanations on such ultra-small devices. To address this, we explored 1) spatially structuring an LLM's explanation text using defined contextual components during prompting and 2) presenting temporally adaptive explanations to users based on confidence levels. We conducted a user study to understand how these approaches impacted user experiences when interacting with LLM recommendations and explanations on ultra-small devices. The results showed that structured explanations reduced users' time to action and cognitive load when reading an explanation. Always-on structured explanations increased users' acceptance of AI recommendations. However, users were less satisfied with structured explanations compared to unstructured ones due to their lack of sufficient, readable details. Additionally, adaptively presenting structured explanations was less effective at improving user perceptions of the AI compared to the always-on structured explanations. Together with users' interview feedback, the results led to design implications to be mindful of when personalizing the content and timing of LLM explanations that are displayed on ultra-small devices.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Feb-26-2025
- Country:
- Oceania > Australia
- Tasmania (0.04)
- North America
- United States
- Virginia (0.04)
- Minnesota > Hennepin County
- Minneapolis (0.14)
- Indiana > Tippecanoe County
- West Lafayette (0.04)
- Lafayette (0.04)
- Hawaii > Honolulu County
- Honolulu (0.04)
- Illinois > Cook County
- Chicago (0.04)
- Texas > Brazos County
- College Station (0.04)
- North Carolina > Mecklenburg County
- Charlotte (0.04)
- Washington > King County
- Redmond (0.05)
- California
- San Diego County > San Diego (0.04)
- San Francisco County > San Francisco (0.04)
- New York > New York County
- New York City (0.05)
- Canada > British Columbia
- United States
- Europe
- United Kingdom > England
- Greater London > London (0.04)
- Switzerland > Basel-City
- Basel (0.04)
- Italy
- Finland > Uusimaa
- Helsinki (0.04)
- United Kingdom > England
- Oceania > Australia
- Genre:
- Questionnaire & Opinion Survey (1.00)
- Research Report
- New Finding (1.00)
- Experimental Study > Negative Result (0.46)
- Industry:
- Information Technology > Security & Privacy (0.92)
- Health & Medicine (0.69)
- Technology: