This paper develops a unified framework for measuring concentration in weighted systems embedded in networks of interactions. While traditional indices such as the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index capture dispersion in weights, they neglect the topology of relationships among the elements receiving those weights. To address this limitation, we introduce a family of topology-aware concentration indices that jointly account for weight distributions and network structure. At the core of the framework lies a baseline Network Concentration Index (NCI), defined as a normalized quadratic form that measures the fraction of potential weighted interconnection realized along observed network links. Building on this foundation, we construct a flexible class of extensions that modify either the interaction structure or the normalization benchmark, including weighted, density-adjusted, null-model, degree-constrained, transformed-data, and multi-layer variants. This family of indices preserves key properties such as normalization, invariance, and interpretability, while allowing concentration to be evaluated across different dimensions of dependence, including intensity, higher-order interactions, and extreme events. Theoretical results characterize the indices and establish their relationship with classical concentration and network measures. Empirical and simulation evidence demonstrate that systems with identical weight distributions may exhibit markedly different levels of structural concentration depending on network topology, highlighting the additional information captured by the proposed framework. The approach is broadly applicable to economic, financial, and complex systems in which weighted elements interact through networks.

Evaluating adversarial robustness amounts to finding the minimum perturbation needed to have an input sample misclassified. The inherent complexity of the underlying optimization requires current gradient-based attacks to be carefully tuned, initialized, and possibly executed for many computationally-demanding iterations, even if specialized to a given perturbation model.

O hides log (nd /") factors.

Humanity faces numerous problems of common-pool resource appropriation.

Ensuring algorithmic fairness remains a significant challenge in machine learning, particularly as models are increasingly applied across diverse domains. While numerous fairness criteria exist, they often lack generalizability across different machine learning problems. This paper examines the connections and differences among various sparsity measures in promoting fairness and proposes a unified sparsity-based framework for evaluating algorithmic fairness. The framework aligns with existing fairness criteria and demonstrates broad applicability to a wide range of machine learning tasks. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed framework as an evaluation metric through extensive experiments on a variety of datasets and bias mitigation methods. This work provides a novel perspective to algorithmic fairness by framing it through the lens of sparsity and social equity, offering potential for broader impact on fairness research and applications.

Leveraging the model's outputs, specifically the logits, is a common approach to