Is Machine Learning Unsafe and Irresponsible in Social Sciences? Paradoxes and Reconsidering from Recidivism Prediction Tasks
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Initially, those scholars employ these historical elements to forecast whether the criminal would re-offend. Subsequently, the binary outcome of recidivism serves as a proxy variable for recidivism risk. Some computer scientists also employ the probability (or score) assigned by the model for an offender's likelihood of re-offense as a gauge for their recidivism risk (Etzler et al., 2023; Ma et al., 2022; Wang et al., 2022). While such configurations may seem intuitively compelling, they often embody an oversimplified and deterministic viewpoint, which stands in contradiction to contemporary social science theories. Firstly, historical factors alone are insufficient predictors of human actions.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Nov-11-2023
- Country:
- Oceania > Australia
- North America > United States
- Kentucky (0.04)
- New York > New York County
- New York City (0.04)
- Europe > Spain
- Catalonia (0.04)
- Asia
- Genre:
- Research Report > Experimental Study (1.00)
- Industry:
- Government (0.93)
- Education (0.93)
- Law Enforcement & Public Safety (0.67)
- Law > Civil Rights & Constitutional Law (0.67)
- Health & Medicine
- Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology (1.00)
- Therapeutic Area (0.68)
- Technology:
- Information Technology
- Data Science > Data Mining (1.00)
- Artificial Intelligence
- Representation & Reasoning (1.00)
- Natural Language (1.00)
- Issues > Social & Ethical Issues (0.95)
- Machine Learning
- Statistical Learning (0.68)
- Neural Networks > Deep Learning (0.46)
- Information Technology