AI Royalties -- an IP Framework to Compensate Artists & IP Holders for AI-Generated Content
Ducru, Pablo, Raiman, Jonathan, Lemos, Ronaldo, Garner, Clay, He, George, Balcha, Hanna, Souto, Gabriel, Branco, Sergio, Bottino, Celina
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
This article investigates how AI-generated content can disrupt central revenue streams of the creative industries, in particular the collection of dividends from intellectual property (IP) rights. It reviews the IP and copyright questions related to the input and output of generative AI systems. A systematic method is proposed to assess whether AI-generated outputs, especially images, infringe previous copyrights, using a similarity metric (CLIP) between images against historical copyright rulings. An examination (economic and technical feasibility) of previously proposed compensation frameworks reveals their financial implications for creatives and IP holders. Lastly, we propose a novel IP framework for compensation of artists and IP holders based on their published "licensed AIs" as a new medium and asset from which to collect AI royalties.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Apr-5-2024
- Country:
- South America > Brazil (0.04)
- Africa > South Africa (0.04)
- North America > United States
- California (0.05)
- Texas (0.04)
- Iowa (0.04)
- Delaware (0.04)
- New York > New York County
- New York City (0.04)
- Massachusetts > Middlesex County
- Cambridge (0.04)
- Europe
- France (0.04)
- United Kingdom
- Wales (0.04)
- England > Cambridgeshire
- Cambridge (0.04)
- Switzerland > Geneva
- Geneva (0.04)
- Italy > Calabria
- Catanzaro Province > Catanzaro (0.04)
- Asia
- Middle East > Israel (0.04)
- China (0.04)
- Genre:
- Research Report (1.00)
- Industry:
- Technology:
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence
- Vision (1.00)
- Natural Language (1.00)
- Issues > Social & Ethical Issues (1.00)
- Machine Learning > Neural Networks
- Deep Learning > Generative AI (0.67)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence