ExpMRC: Explainability Evaluation for Machine Reading Comprehension
Cui, Yiming, Liu, Ting, Che, Wanxiang, Chen, Zhigang, Wang, Shijin
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Achieving human-level performance on some of Machine Reading Comprehension (MRC) datasets is no longer challenging with the help of powerful Pre-trained Language Models (PLMs). However, it is necessary to provide both answer prediction and its explanation to further improve the MRC system's reliability, especially for real-life applications. In this paper, we propose a new benchmark called ExpMRC for evaluating the explainability of the MRC systems. ExpMRC contains four subsets, including SQuAD, CMRC 2018, RACE$^+$, and C$^3$ with additional annotations of the answer's evidence. The MRC systems are required to give not only the correct answer but also its explanation. We use state-of-the-art pre-trained language models to build baseline systems and adopt various unsupervised approaches to extract evidence without a human-annotated training set. The experimental results show that these models are still far from human performance, suggesting that the ExpMRC is challenging. Resources will be available through https://github.com/ymcui/expmrc
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
May-10-2021
- Country:
- Oceania > Australia
- North America > United States
- Minnesota > Hennepin County > Minneapolis (0.14)
- Europe
- Asia > China
- Hong Kong (0.04)
- Heilongjiang Province > Harbin (0.04)
- Genre:
- Research Report > New Finding (0.34)
- Industry:
- Education > Assessment & Standards > Student Performance (0.62)
- Technology: