Turning Fixed to Adaptive: Integrating Post-Evaluation into Simultaneous Machine Translation

However, the previous methods, including fixed Simultaneous machine translation (SiMT) (Gu and adaptive policies, lack evaluation before taking et al., 2017; Ma et al., 2019; Arivazhagan et al., the next action. For fixed policy (Ma et al., 2019; 2019; Ma et al., 2020; Zhang and Feng, 2021b, Elbayad et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2021; Zhang 2022d) starts translation before reading the whole and Feng, 2021c), the model generates translation source sentence. It seeks to achieve good latencyquality according to the predefined translation rules. Although tradeoffs and is suitable for various scenarios it only relies on simple training methods, with different latency tolerances. Compared to it cannot make full use of the context to decide an full-sentence machine translation, SiMT is more appropriate translation policy. For adaptive policy challenging because it lacks partial source content (Gu et al., 2017; Arivazhagan et al., 2019; Ma in translation and needs to decide on translation et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2022), the model can policy additionally.