Comparing scalable strategies for generating numerical perspectives

Like other extreme quantities (for example, a distance of 34 parsecs), unfamiliar dollar amounts can be hard to fathom without comparison to something else [7, 18]. To address this issue, it can be useful to employ perspectives: re-phrasings of measurements that make them easier to understand, via a change of units to express the focal number on a different scale, or a comparison to a reference object. For instance, $330 billion can be re-expressed using perspectives of "about $1,000 per person in the United States" or "about 5% of the United States Federal Budget". In addition to being intuitively appealing and perceived as helpful [6, 10, 13], perspectives have been shown to aid numerical comprehension by boosting recall, estimation, error detection, and prediction [3, 12, 27], which could find relevance in a wide variety of downstream applications. These demonstrations of the benefits of perspectives have led to questions around what makes some analogies better than others, and if and how one can generate high-quality perspectives at scale for naturally occurring mentions of measurements. Approaches to automated perspective generation have varied, but they generally rely on first constructing a database of reference objects to compare measurements to and then prioritizing analogies to these reference objects that are both familiar and helpful to the reader [10, 27]. Prioritizing reference objects is complicated by the fact that what is most helpful for understanding a measurement can be difficult to quantify and can depend on the context in which the measurement occurs.