Strategic Decisions Survey, Taxonomy, and Future Directions from Artificial Intelligence Perspective
Wu, Caesar, Ramamohanarao, Kotagiri, Zhang, Rui, Bouvry, Pascal
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Strategic Decision-Making is always challenging because it is inherently uncertain, ambiguous, risky, and complex. It is the art of possibility. We develop a systematic taxonomy of decision-making frames that consists of 6 bases, 18 categorical, and 54 frames. We aim to lay out the computational foundation that is possible to capture a comprehensive landscape view of a strategic problem. Compared with traditional models, it covers irrational, non-rational and rational frames c dealing with certainty, uncertainty, complexity, ambiguity, chaos, and ignorance.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Oct-22-2022
- Country:
- Africa > Sierra Leone (0.04)
- Asia > Japan
- Honshū > Chūbu > Ishikawa Prefecture > Kanazawa (0.04)
- Europe
- France > Île-de-France
- Germany > Berlin (0.04)
- Netherlands > North Holland
- Amsterdam (0.04)
- Switzerland (0.04)
- United Kingdom > England
- Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.14)
- Essex (0.04)
- Greater London > London (0.04)
- Oxfordshire > Oxford (0.14)
- North America > United States
- California
- San Bernardino County > Redlands (0.04)
- San Francisco County > San Francisco (0.14)
- Ventura County > Thousand Oaks (0.04)
- Florida > Palm Beach County
- Boca Raton (0.04)
- Massachusetts > Suffolk County
- Boston (0.04)
- Michigan (0.04)
- New Jersey (0.04)
- New York (0.05)
- Texas > Travis County
- Austin (0.04)
- California
- Oceania > Australia (0.04)
- Genre:
- Overview (1.00)
- Research Report (1.00)
- Industry:
- Education (1.00)
- Government (1.00)
- Health & Medicine > Therapeutic Area
- Neurology (0.46)
- Information Technology (0.92)
- Law (0.67)
- Technology: