A Consensus Privacy Metrics Framework for Synthetic Data
Pilgram, Lisa, Dankar, Fida K., Drechsler, Jorg, Elliot, Mark, Domingo-Ferrer, Josep, Francis, Paul, Kantarcioglu, Murat, Kong, Linglong, Malin, Bradley, Muralidhar, Krishnamurty, Myles, Puja, Prasser, Fabian, Raisaro, Jean Louis, Yan, Chao, Emam, Khaled El
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Synthetic data generation is one approach for sharing individual-level data. However, to meet legislative requirements, it is necessary to demonstrate that the individuals' privacy is adequately protected. There is no consolidated standard for measuring privacy in synthetic data. Through an expert panel and consensus process, we developed a framework for evaluating privacy in synthetic data. Our findings indicate that current similarity metrics fail to measure identity disclosure, and their use is discouraged. For differentially private synthetic data, a privacy budget other than close to zero was not considered interpretable. There was consensus on the importance of membership and attribute disclosure, both of which involve inferring personal information about an individual without necessarily revealing their identity. The resultant framework provides precise recommendations for metrics that address these types of disclosures effectively. Our findings further present specific opportunities for future research that can help with widespread adoption of synthetic data.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Mar-6-2025
- Country:
- North America
- United States
- Washington (0.04)
- California (0.04)
- Oklahoma (0.04)
- District of Columbia > Washington (0.04)
- Maine (0.04)
- Vermont (0.04)
- Virginia (0.04)
- Texas > Travis County
- Austin (0.04)
- New Mexico > Los Alamos County
- Los Alamos (0.04)
- Maryland > Montgomery County
- Rockville (0.04)
- New York
- New York County > New York City (0.04)
- Monroe County > Rochester (0.04)
- Tennessee > Davidson County
- Nashville (0.04)
- Massachusetts > Middlesex County
- Cambridge (0.04)
- Florida > Palm Beach County
- Boca Raton (0.04)
- Canada
- Alberta (0.14)
- Ontario
- Toronto (0.04)
- National Capital Region > Ottawa (0.04)
- British Columbia > Metro Vancouver Regional District
- Vancouver (0.04)
- United States
- Europe
- Netherlands (0.14)
- Italy (0.04)
- United Kingdom > England
- Greater Manchester > Manchester (0.04)
- Greater London > London (0.04)
- Switzerland > Vaud
- Lausanne (0.04)
- Spain
- Catalonia > Tarragona Province
- Tarragona (0.04)
- Andalusia > Córdoba Province
- Córdoba (0.04)
- Catalonia > Tarragona Province
- Germany
- Berlin (0.14)
- Bavaria
- Upper Bavaria > Munich (0.04)
- Middle Franconia > Nuremberg (0.04)
- Denmark > Capital Region
- Copenhagen (0.04)
- Asia
- Singapore (0.04)
- Middle East > Israel (0.04)
- South Korea (0.04)
- North America
- Genre:
- Research Report
- New Finding (1.00)
- Experimental Study (1.00)
- Research Report
- Industry:
- Information Technology > Security & Privacy (1.00)
- Law > Civil Rights & Constitutional Law (0.92)
- Health & Medicine
- Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology (1.00)
- Health Care Providers & Services (1.00)
- Epidemiology (0.93)
- Consumer Health (0.92)
- Health Care Technology > Medical Record (0.68)
- Therapeutic Area
- Infections and Infectious Diseases (1.00)
- Cardiology/Vascular Diseases (1.00)
- Immunology > HIV (0.93)
- Oncology (0.92)
- Internal Medicine (0.68)
- Government > Regional Government
- Technology:
- Information Technology
- Security & Privacy (1.00)
- Modeling & Simulation (1.00)
- Information Management (1.00)
- Data Science > Data Mining (1.00)
- Communications (1.00)
- Artificial Intelligence
- Representation & Reasoning (1.00)
- Natural Language (1.00)
- Machine Learning
- Statistical Learning (1.00)
- Performance Analysis > Accuracy (1.00)
- Neural Networks (1.00)
- Information Technology