Modelling Creativity: Identifying Key Components through a Corpus-Based Approach
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
As Torrance observes: '[c]reativity defies precise definition... even if we had a precise conception of creativity, I am certain we would have difficulty putting it into words' [15, p. 43]. Many other authors have expressed similar difficulties [7, 10, 16]. In their review of research into human creativity, Hennessey and Amabile ask a significant follow-on question: 'Even if this mysterious phenomenon can be isolated, quantified, and dissected, why bother? Wouldn't it make more sense to revel in the mystery and wonder of it all?' [11, p. 570] Two answers to this question are offered by Hennessey and Amabile, both of which are identified as desirable: to gain a deeper understanding of creativity and to learn how to boost people's creativity. Creativity can and should be studied and measured scientifically, but the lack of a commonly-agreed understanding causes problems for measurement [10]. Plucker et al. make recommendations about best practice based on their own survey of the creativity literature: 'we argue that creativity researchers must (a) explicitly define what they mean by creativity, (b) avoid using scores of creativity measures as the sole definition of creativity (e.g., creativity is what creativity tests measure and creativity tests measure creativity, therefore we will use a score on a creativity test as our outcome variable), (c) discuss how the definition they are using is similar to or different from other definitions, and (d) address the question of creativity for whom and in what context.' [9, p.92] In short, we need to specify and justify the standards that we use to judge creativity. A more objective and well-articulated account of how creativity is manifested enables researchers to make a worthwhile contribution [8-10]. Particularly, in research we would like to focus on what processes and concepts relevant to creativity are'sufficiently important to warrant study' [17, p. 15], based on an accumulation of the body of work on creativity to date [17].
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Sep-12-2016
- Country:
- Asia > China
- Europe
- France > Occitanie
- Hérault > Montpellier (0.04)
- Netherlands > North Holland
- Amsterdam (0.04)
- Portugal > Lisbon
- Lisbon (0.04)
- United Kingdom > England
- Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.14)
- East Sussex > Brighton (0.04)
- Greater London > London (0.04)
- Kent (0.04)
- Lancashire > Lancaster (0.04)
- Oxfordshire > Oxford (0.04)
- South Yorkshire > Sheffield (0.04)
- France > Occitanie
- North America > United States
- New York > New York County
- New York City (0.04)
- Colorado > Boulder County
- Boulder (0.04)
- District of Columbia > Washington (0.04)
- Illinois
- Cook County > Chicago (0.04)
- DuPage County > Bensenville (0.04)
- Wisconsin > Dane County
- Madison (0.04)
- New Jersey > Mercer County
- Princeton (0.04)
- Massachusetts > Middlesex County
- Cambridge (0.04)
- California > Alameda County
- Berkeley (0.04)
- Minnesota (0.04)
- New York > New York County
- Oceania > Australia
- New South Wales > Sydney (0.04)
- Genre:
- Instructional Material > Course Syllabus & Notes (0.66)
- Research Report (1.00)
- Industry:
- Education (1.00)
- Health & Medicine > Therapeutic Area
- Neurology (0.93)
- Technology: