Taming State Surveillance: Reconciling Camera Surveillance Technology with Human Rights Obligations - HillNotes
Centralized state camera surveillance is but one component of a burgeoning practice of personal data collection paired with artificial intelligence (AI). Camera surveillance is not inherently unlawful and has long been used at border-crossings, airports, and other high-security areas. However, recent technological advances have contributed to the spread of a more intrusive form of video surveillance that includes powerful, if imperfect, facial recognition abilities and AI decision making. While the technology offers states the ability to, among other things, identify lost children, identify criminals, and monitor threats, the new capacity also raises significant human rights issues. The use of camera surveillance has grown with leaps in technology, including the introduction of videocassette recorders in the 1970s and the internet in the 1990s.
Mar-16-2020, 13:58:25 GMT
- Country:
- South America > Ecuador (0.05)
- Oceania > Australia (0.05)
- North America
- United States
- Oregon > Multnomah County
- Portland (0.05)
- Massachusetts > Middlesex County
- Somerville (0.05)
- California
- San Francisco County > San Francisco (0.05)
- Alameda County > Oakland (0.05)
- Oregon > Multnomah County
- Canada
- Quebec (0.05)
- British Columbia (0.05)
- Alberta (0.05)
- United States
- Europe
- United Kingdom (0.05)
- Serbia (0.05)
- Russia (0.05)
- Germany (0.05)
- Asia
- China (0.31)
- Russia (0.05)
- Middle East > UAE (0.05)
- India (0.05)
- Central Asia (0.05)
- Africa
- Uganda (0.05)
- Middle East > Algeria (0.05)
- Mauritius (0.05)
- Industry:
- Law > Civil Rights & Constitutional Law (1.00)
- Information Technology > Security & Privacy (1.00)
- Government (1.00)
- Technology:
- Information Technology
- Security & Privacy (1.00)
- Artificial Intelligence (1.00)
- Communications > Networks (0.58)
- Information Technology