Towards Supporting Legal Argumentation with NLP: Is More Data Really All You Need?

AI&Law as a field started started in the 1970s, when Buchanan and Headrick (1970) suggested Law has been an attractive domain for AI in both that computer modeling of legal reasoning would symbolic knowledge representation and statistical be a promising area for research to better understand NLP. Both strands share the common goal of supporting legal reasoning and argumentation. Many legal practice through enhancing legal research, approaches have been proposed over the past three document analysis, drafting, and decision decades capturing several types of reasoning by making. A focal question distinguishing them remains means of symbolic representations. Some 50 years whether, and how, the process of legal reasoning after the field's beginnings, the legal profession is underlying all textual data shall be explicitly experiencing considerable disruption by NLP technology, represented or left to opaque components, such as most prominently large language models generative language models or neural classifiers.