A Law Reasoning Benchmark for LLM with Tree-Organized Structures including Factum Probandum, Evidence and Experiences
Shen, Jiaxin, Xu, Jinan, Hu, Huiqi, Lin, Luyi, Zheng, Fei, Ma, Guoyang, Meng, Fandong, Zhou, Jie, Han, Wenjuan
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
While progress has been made in legal applications, law reasoning, crucial for fair adjudication, remains unexplored. We propose a transparent law reasoning schema enriched with hierarchical factum probandum, evidence, and implicit experience, enabling public scrutiny and preventing bias. Inspired by this schema, we introduce the challenging task, which takes a textual case description and outputs a hierarchical structure justifying the final decision. We also create the first crowd-sourced dataset for this task, enabling comprehensive evaluation. Simultaneously, we propose an agent framework that employs a comprehensive suite of legal analysis tools to address the challenge task. This benchmark paves the way for transparent and accountable AI-assisted law reasoning in the ``Intelligent Court''.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Mar-2-2025
- Country:
- Europe
- Middle East > Malta (0.14)
- United Kingdom > England (0.14)
- North America > Mexico
- Mexico City (0.14)
- Europe
- Genre:
- Research Report > New Finding (0.46)
- Industry:
- Government (1.00)
- Law (1.00)
- Law Enforcement & Public Safety > Crime Prevention & Enforcement (0.46)
- Technology: