To Test Machine Comprehension, Start by Defining Comprehension
Dunietz, Jesse, Burnham, Gregory, Bharadwaj, Akash, Rambow, Owen, Chu-Carroll, Jennifer, Ferrucci, David
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Many tasks aim to measure machine reading comprehension (MRC), often focusing on question types presumed to be difficult. Rarely, however, do task designers start by considering what systems should in fact comprehend. In this paper we make two key contributions. First, we argue that existing approaches do not adequately define comprehension; they are too unsystematic about what content is tested. Second, we present a detailed definition of comprehension -- a "Template of Understanding" -- for a widely useful class of texts, namely short narratives. We then conduct an experiment that strongly suggests existing systems are not up to the task of narrative understanding as we define it.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
May-11-2020
- Country:
- Asia > China
- Hong Kong (0.04)
- Europe
- Belgium > Brussels-Capital Region
- Brussels (0.04)
- Denmark > Capital Region
- Copenhagen (0.04)
- Germany > Berlin (0.04)
- Ireland > Leinster
- County Dublin > Dublin (0.04)
- Italy > Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol
- Trentino Province > Trento (0.04)
- Portugal > Lisbon
- Lisbon (0.04)
- Sweden > Vaestra Goetaland
- Gothenburg (0.04)
- Belgium > Brussels-Capital Region
- North America
- Canada > British Columbia
- Puerto Rico > San Juan
- San Juan (0.04)
- United States
- Massachusetts
- Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.04)
- Suffolk County > Boston (0.04)
- Connecticut > New Haven County
- New Haven (0.04)
- Pennsylvania (0.04)
- Washington > King County
- Seattle (0.04)
- California > Santa Clara County
- Stanford (0.04)
- Louisiana > Orleans Parish
- New Orleans (0.04)
- Wisconsin > Dunn County
- Menomonie (0.04)
- Texas (0.04)
- Maryland > Prince George's County
- College Park (0.04)
- Minnesota > Hennepin County
- Minneapolis (0.14)
- Massachusetts
- Oceania > Australia
- Asia > China
- Genre:
- Research Report (0.64)
- Industry:
- Education (0.89)
- Health & Medicine
- Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology (1.00)
- Therapeutic Area > Oncology (0.46)
- Technology: