Every word counts: A multilingual analysis of individual human alignment with model attention
Brandl, Stephanie, Hollenstein, Nora
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
We carry out this correlation reading (Morger et al., 2022; Eberle et al., 2022; analysis on the participants' respective native Bensemann et al., 2022; Hollenstein and Beinborn, languages (L1) and data from an English experiment 2021; Sood et al., 2020). This approach serves as (L2) of the same participants. We analyse an interpretability tool and helps to quantify the the influence of processing depth, i.e., quantifying cognitive plausibility of language models. However, the thoroughness of reading through the readers' what drives these correlations in terms of differences skipping behaviour, part-of-speech (POS) tags, and between individual readers has not been vocabulary knowledge in the form of LexTALE investigated.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Oct-5-2022
- Country:
- North America
- Europe
- Netherlands (0.04)
- Sweden > Vaestra Goetaland
- Gothenburg (0.04)
- Italy > Tuscany
- Florence (0.04)
- Ireland > Leinster
- County Dublin > Dublin (0.05)
- France > Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur
- Bouches-du-Rhône > Marseille (0.04)
- Denmark > Capital Region
- Copenhagen (0.05)
- Asia > China
- Hong Kong (0.05)
- Genre:
- Research Report (1.00)
- Industry:
- Education (0.68)
- Technology: