Less is More for Long Document Summary Evaluation by LLMs
Wu, Yunshu, Iso, Hayate, Pezeshkpour, Pouya, Bhutani, Nikita, Hruschka, Estevam
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promising performance in summary evaluation tasks, yet they face challenges such as high computational costs and the Lost-in-the-Middle problem where important information in the middle of long documents is often overlooked. To address these issues, this paper introduces a novel approach, Extract-then-Evaluate, which involves extracting key sentences from a long source document and then evaluating the summary by prompting LLMs. The results reveal that the proposed method not only significantly reduces evaluation costs but also exhibits a higher correlation with human evaluations. Furthermore, we provide practical recommendations for optimal document length and sentence extraction methods, contributing to the development of cost-effective yet more accurate methods for LLM-based text generation evaluation.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Jan-18-2024
- Country:
- North America
- United States
- Louisiana > Orleans Parish
- New Orleans (0.04)
- California > Riverside County
- Riverside (0.04)
- Louisiana > Orleans Parish
- Canada
- Ontario > Toronto (0.04)
- British Columbia > Metro Vancouver Regional District
- Vancouver (0.04)
- United States
- Europe
- Spain > Catalonia
- Barcelona Province > Barcelona (0.04)
- Portugal > Lisbon
- Lisbon (0.04)
- Croatia > Dubrovnik-Neretva County
- Dubrovnik (0.04)
- Spain > Catalonia
- Asia
- Singapore (0.04)
- China > Hong Kong (0.04)
- Middle East > UAE
- Abu Dhabi Emirate > Abu Dhabi (0.04)
- North America
- Genre:
- Research Report > New Finding (0.46)
- Technology: