Fairness: from the ethical principle to the practice of Machine Learning development as an ongoing agreement with stakeholders
Curto, Georgina, Comim, Flavio
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
This paper clarifies why bias cannot be completely mitigated in Machine Learning (ML) and proposes an end-to-end methodology to translate the ethical principle of justice and fairness into the practice of ML development as an ongoing agreement with stakeholders. The pro-ethical iterative process presented in the paper aims to challenge asymmetric power dynamics in the fairness decision making within ML design and support ML development teams to identify, mitigate and monitor bias at each step of ML systems development. The process also provides guidance on how to explain the always imperfect trade-offs in terms of bias to users.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Mar-22-2023
- Country:
- South America (0.04)
- North America
- Central America (0.04)
- United States
- New York (0.04)
- Pennsylvania (0.04)
- New Jersey > Mercer County
- Princeton (0.04)
- Minnesota > Hennepin County
- Minneapolis (0.04)
- Massachusetts > Middlesex County
- Cambridge (0.14)
- California > Santa Clara County
- Palo Alto (0.04)
- Europe
- United Kingdom > England
- Oxfordshire > Oxford (0.04)
- Greater London > London (0.04)
- Spain > Catalonia
- Barcelona Province > Barcelona (0.04)
- United Kingdom > England
- Asia
- China (0.04)
- Southeast Asia (0.04)
- Africa > Eswatini
- Genre:
- Workflow (0.88)
- Research Report (0.82)
- Industry:
- Government (1.00)
- Law > Civil Rights & Constitutional Law (0.93)
- Technology: