UICrit: Enhancing Automated Design Evaluation with a UICritique Dataset
Duan, Peitong, Chen, Chin-yi, Li, Gang, Hartmann, Bjoern, Li, Yang
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Automated UI evaluation can be beneficial for the design process; for example, to compare different UI designs, or conduct automated heuristic evaluation. LLM-based UI evaluation, in particular, holds the promise of generalizability to a wide variety of UI types and evaluation tasks. However, current LLM-based techniques do not yet match the performance of human evaluators. We hypothesize that automatic evaluation can be improved by collecting a targeted UI feedback dataset and then using this dataset to enhance the performance of general-purpose LLMs. We present a targeted dataset of 3,059 design critiques and quality ratings for 983 mobile UIs, collected from seven experienced designers. We carried out an in-depth analysis to characterize the dataset's features. We then applied this dataset to achieve a 55% performance gain in LLM-generated UI feedback via various few-shot and visual prompting techniques. We also discuss future applications of this dataset, including training a reward model for generative UI techniques, and fine-tuning a tool-agnostic multi-modal LLM that automates UI evaluation.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Jul-15-2024
- Country:
- Oceania > Australia
- Queensland > Brisbane (0.04)
- North America
- Canada (0.04)
- United States
- District of Columbia > Washington (0.05)
- Virginia (0.04)
- Washington > King County
- Seattle (0.04)
- New York > New York County
- New York City (0.05)
- Massachusetts > Suffolk County
- Boston (0.04)
- Louisiana > Orleans Parish
- New Orleans (0.04)
- Hawaii > Honolulu County
- Honolulu (0.04)
- California
- Santa Clara County > Mountain View (0.04)
- Alameda County > Berkeley (0.04)
- San Francisco County > San Francisco (0.04)
- Europe
- Asia > Middle East
- Jordan (0.04)
- Oceania > Australia
- Genre:
- Research Report (0.64)
- Industry:
- Information Technology (0.67)
- Technology: