Detection of decision-making manipulation in the pairwise comparisons method
Strada, Michał, Ernst, Sebastian, Szybowski, Jacek, Kułakowski, Konrad
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Manipulation of the decision-making process can have serious consequences that can negatively affect individuals [26], society, or organizations [19]. Prejudice, external pressures, bribery, or multiple factors can influence decision-makers, leading to sub-optimal outcomes or harm. In political elections, propaganda, disinformation, or bribery can manipulate voters and influence elections [15], leading to long-term societal consequences. We can take various measures to prevent manipulation and ensure transparency [2] and objectivity in decision-making. For example, the number of decision-makers can be increased to make manipulation more difficult [35], or the decision-making processes may be subject to external oversight (or review) to ensure compliance with ethical and legal standards [16].
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
May-26-2024
- Country:
- Asia > China (0.04)
- Europe
- Germany (0.04)
- Poland > Lesser Poland Province
- Kraków (0.04)
- United Kingdom > England
- Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Genre:
- Research Report (1.00)
- Industry:
- Government (0.68)
- Information Technology > Security & Privacy (0.46)
- Law (0.88)
- Technology: