On Parsing as Tagging
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
There have been many proposals to reduce constituency parsing to tagging in the literature. To better understand what these approaches have in common, we cast several existing proposals into a unifying pipeline consisting of three steps: linearization, learning, and decoding. In particular, we show how to reduce tetratagging, a state-of-the-art constituency tagger, to shift--reduce parsing by performing a right-corner transformation on the grammar and making a specific independence assumption. Furthermore, we empirically evaluate our taxonomy of tagging pipelines with different choices of linearizers, learners, and decoders. Based on the results in English and a set of 8 typologically diverse languages, we conclude that the linearization of the derivation tree and its alignment with the input sequence is the most critical factor in achieving accurate taggers.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Nov-20-2022
- Country:
- Oceania > Australia
- North America
- United States
- Maryland > Baltimore (0.04)
- Washington > King County
- Seattle (0.04)
- Oregon > Multnomah County
- Portland (0.04)
- New Mexico > Santa Fe County
- Santa Fe (0.04)
- Minnesota > Hennepin County
- Minneapolis (0.14)
- California > San Francisco County
- San Francisco (0.14)
- Canada > Quebec
- Montreal (0.04)
- United States
- Europe
- Spain > Catalonia
- Barcelona Province > Barcelona (0.04)
- Italy > Tuscany
- Florence (0.04)
- Ireland > Leinster
- County Dublin > Dublin (0.04)
- France
- Île-de-France > Paris
- Paris (0.04)
- Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur > Bouches-du-Rhône
- Marseille (0.04)
- Grand Est > Meurthe-et-Moselle
- Nancy (0.04)
- Île-de-France > Paris
- Bulgaria > Sofia City Province
- Sofia (0.04)
- Belgium > Brussels-Capital Region
- Brussels (0.04)
- Spain > Catalonia
- Genre:
- Research Report > New Finding (0.68)
- Technology: