Can You Program Ethics Into a Self-Driving Car?
A drunken man walking along a sidewalk at night trips and falls directly in front of a driverless car, which strikes him square on, killing him instantly. Had a human been at the wheel, the death would have been considered an accident because the pedestrian was clearly at fault and no reasonable person could have swerved in time. But the "reasonable person" legal standard for driver negligence disappeared back in the 2020s, when the proliferation of driverless cars reduced crash rates by 90 percent. Now the standard is that of the reasonable robot. The victim's family sues the vehicle manufacturer on that ground, claiming that, although the car didn't have time to brake, it could have swerved around the pedestrian, crossing the double yellow line and colliding with the empty driverless vehicle in the next lane.
Jun-6-2016, 13:05:32 GMT
- Country:
- Asia > Japan (0.04)
- Europe
- Germany (0.04)
- Netherlands (0.04)
- United Kingdom (0.04)
- North America > United States
- California (0.04)
- District of Columbia (0.04)
- Virginia > Albemarle County
- Charlottesville (0.04)
- Industry:
- Technology: