Alexa, Google, Siri: What are Your Pronouns? Gender and Anthropomorphism in the Design and Perception of Conversational Assistants
Abercrombie, Gavin, Curry, Amanda Cercas, Pandya, Mugdha, Rieser, Verena
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Technology companies have produced varied responses to concerns about the effects of the design of their conversational AI systems. Some have claimed that their voice assistants are in fact not gendered or human-like -- despite design features suggesting the contrary. We compare these claims to user perceptions by analysing the pronouns they use when referring to AI assistants. We also examine systems' responses and the extent to which they generate output which is gendered and anthropomorphic. We find that, while some companies appear to be addressing the ethical concerns raised, in some cases, their claims do not seem to hold true. In particular, our results show that system outputs are ambiguous as to the humanness of the systems, and that users tend to personify and gender them as a result.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Jun-4-2021
- Country:
- Oceania > Australia
- North America > United States
- Oregon > Multnomah County
- Portland (0.04)
- New York > New York County
- New York City (0.04)
- Minnesota > Hennepin County
- Minneapolis (0.04)
- Louisiana > Orleans Parish
- New Orleans (0.04)
- Oregon > Multnomah County
- Europe
- United Kingdom
- Scotland > City of Edinburgh
- Edinburgh (0.04)
- England
- Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.14)
- Oxfordshire > Oxford (0.04)
- Scotland > City of Edinburgh
- Sweden > Stockholm
- Stockholm (0.04)
- Spain > Catalonia
- Barcelona Province > Barcelona (0.04)
- Middle East > Malta
- Port Region > Southern Harbour District > Valletta (0.04)
- Italy > Tuscany
- Florence (0.04)
- United Kingdom
- Asia > Middle East
- Jordan (0.04)
- Genre:
- Research Report > New Finding (0.68)
- Industry:
- Information Technology (1.00)
- Technology: