Forecasting Local Ionospheric Parameters Using Transformers

Accurate and efficient modeling of Earth's ionosphere has a significant impact on research and operational communities due to its effects on radio communications, radar performance, [1, 2, 3] and satellite drag [4]. Success in forecasting key parameters such as the F2 layer critical frequency (foF2) and height (hmF2) and the total electron content (TEC) allows one to anticipate and mitigate the impacts of ionospheric variability on such systems. Over the past decades, many modeling approaches have been developed to predict these ionospheric parameters with increasing accuracy and skill. These models may be broadly categorized as empirical, physics-based, and, more recently, machine learning methods. Empirical models often rely on extensive historical datasets to establish statistical relationships between ionospheric parameters and geophysical variables. The International Reference Ionosphere (IRI) model [5] is a widely used standard that provides monthly averages of various ionospheric parameters based on many decades of past observations. IRI has seen continual development and improvements over the years, adding a host of submodels used to capture specific aspects of the ionosphere such as the CCIR [6, 7] and URSI [8] foF2 models for representing the diurnal variations of the peak plasma density across the globe, the AMTB [9] and SHU-2015 [10] models for even more harmonic expansions of hmF2, and NeQuick 2 [11] for improved topside electron density accuracy and thus better estimates of TEC [12, 13]. So, while large empirical models like IRI continue to improve, the number of these available options needed to address each domain and source of variance in the ionosphere also grows, and choosing the appropriate settings may be prohibitive without expert knowledge of each submodel.