User-Specific Bicluster-based Collaborative Filtering: Handling Preference Locality, Sparsity and Subjectivity
Silva, Miguel G., Henriques, Rui, Madeira, Sara C.
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
As an attempt to cope with massive range of options, there has been large academic and industry interest in automatically recommending items to individuals since last century. Spotify, Amazon, Netflix, and Facebook are some popular platforms that actively use recommender systems [13]. From e-commerce to online advertisement, these systems are unavoidable in our daily online journeys to suggest items in a personalized way. Collaborative Filtering (CF) approaches, firstly proposed by [19], are currently seen as the widest implemented and most mature of the technologies to build recommender systems. Given a set of observed item ratings, CF aims at estimating unknown preferences based on the assumption that users with similar preferences in the past will yield similar preferences in the future. Despite the role of Collaborative Filtering, significant challenges limit its effectiveness, including the diversity and locality of user preferences, the structural sparsity of user-item ratings, the subjectivity of rating scales, and the increasingly large user and item bases [13, 49]. To address the diversity of user profiles, reduce the dimensionality and minimize rating sparsity, matrix factorization and clustering approaches have been combined within CF approaches for two decades [13]. However, traditional clustering techniques are typically applied to either group users or items separately. In real-world CF scenarios, the preferences of a subset of users is frequently only significantly correlated on a subset of the overall items, and vice versa [47].
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Nov-15-2022
- Country:
- South America > Brazil
- Rio de Janeiro > Rio de Janeiro (0.04)
- Bahia > Salvador (0.04)
- North America
- United States
- New York (0.04)
- Hawaii (0.04)
- District of Columbia > Washington (0.04)
- Texas > Harris County
- Houston (0.04)
- North Carolina > Orange County
- Chapel Hill (0.04)
- Nevada > Clark County
- Las Vegas (0.04)
- Pennsylvania > Philadelphia County
- Philadelphia (0.04)
- Illinois > Cook County
- Chicago (0.04)
- California
- Santa Clara County > Palo Alto (0.04)
- San Diego County > San Diego (0.04)
- Canada > British Columbia
- United States
- Europe
- Asia
- South America > Brazil
- Genre:
- Research Report (1.00)
- Industry:
- Health & Medicine > Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology (1.00)
- Information Technology > Services (0.88)
- Media (0.74)