Summaries, Highlights, and Action items: Design, implementation and evaluation of an LLM-powered meeting recap system
Asthana, Sumit, Hilleli, Sagih, He, Pengcheng, Halfaker, Aaron
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Meetings play a critical infrastructural role in the coordination of work. In recent years, due to shift to hybrid and remote work, more meetings are moving to online Computer Mediated Spaces. This has led to new problems (e.g. more time spent in less engaging meetings) and new opportunities (e.g. automated transcription/captioning and recap support). Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) for dialog summarization have the potential to improve the experience of meetings by reducing individuals' meeting load and increasing the clarity and alignment of meeting outputs. Despite this potential, they face technological limitation due to long transcripts and inability to capture diverse recap needs based on user's context. To address these gaps, we design, implement and evaluate in-context a meeting recap system. We first conceptualize two salient recap representations -- important highlights, and a structured, hierarchical minutes view. We develop a system to operationalize the representations with dialogue summarization as its building blocks. Finally, we evaluate the effectiveness of the system with seven users in the context of their work meetings. Our findings show promise in using LLM-based dialogue summarization for meeting recap and the need for both representations in different contexts. However, we find that LLM-based recap still lacks an understanding of whats personally relevant to participants, can miss important details, and mis-attributions can be detrimental to group dynamics. We identify collaboration opportunities such as a shared recap document that a high quality recap enables. We report on implications for designing AI systems to partner with users to learn and improve from natural interactions to overcome the limitations related to personal relevance and summarization quality.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Jul-28-2023
- Country:
- Oceania > Australia
- New South Wales > Sydney (0.04)
- North America
- Dominican Republic (0.04)
- United States
- Virginia (0.04)
- Michigan > Washtenaw County
- Ann Arbor (0.14)
- Minnesota > Hennepin County
- Minneapolis (0.14)
- North Carolina > Orange County
- Chapel Hill (0.04)
- Massachusetts > Suffolk County
- Boston (0.04)
- Hawaii > Honolulu County
- Honolulu (0.04)
- Oregon > Multnomah County
- Portland (0.04)
- Illinois > Cook County
- Chicago (0.04)
- Washington > King County
- Georgia > Chatham County
- Savannah (0.04)
- California
- Santa Clara County > San Jose (0.04)
- Alameda County > Berkeley (0.04)
- New York > New York County
- New York City (0.05)
- Canada
- Ontario > Toronto (0.04)
- British Columbia > Metro Vancouver Regional District
- Vancouver (0.04)
- Europe
- United Kingdom
- Scotland > City of Glasgow
- Glasgow (0.04)
- England
- Merseyside > Liverpool (0.04)
- Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Scotland > City of Glasgow
- Spain
- Canary Islands > Gran Canaria (0.04)
- Catalonia > Barcelona Province
- Barcelona (0.04)
- Finland > Uusimaa
- Helsinki (0.04)
- United Kingdom
- Asia
- India (0.04)
- China > Hong Kong (0.04)
- Myanmar > Tanintharyi Region
- Dawei (0.04)
- Middle East > Israel
- Tel Aviv District > Tel Aviv (0.04)
- Japan
- Honshū > Kantō
- Kanagawa Prefecture > Yokohama (0.04)
- Hokkaidō > Hokkaidō Prefecture
- Sapporo (0.04)
- Honshū > Kantō
- Oceania > Australia
- Genre:
- Research Report > New Finding (1.00)
- Overview (1.00)
- Industry:
- Health & Medicine > Therapeutic Area (0.48)
- Technology: