Who Finds the Short Proof? An Exploration of Variants of Boolos' Curious Inference using Higher-order Automated Theorem Provers
Benzmüller, Christoph, Fuenmayor, David, Steen, Alexander, Sutcliffe, Geoff
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
This paper reports on an exploration of Boolos' Curious Inference, using higher-order automated theorem provers (ATPs). Surprisingly, only suitable shorthand notations had to be provided by hand for ATPs to find a short proof. The higher-order lemmas required for constructing a short proof are automatically discovered by the ATPs. Given the observations and suggestions in this paper, full proof automation of Boolos' and related examples now seems to be within reach of higher-order ATPs.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Dec-1-2022
- Country:
- Asia > Russia (0.04)
- North America > United States
- District of Columbia > Washington (0.04)
- Massachusetts > Middlesex County
- Cambridge (0.14)
- Florida > Miami-Dade County
- Coral Gables (0.04)
- California > Santa Clara County
- Palo Alto (0.04)
- Europe
- Austria > Vienna (0.14)
- Italy (0.04)
- Netherlands (0.04)
- Czechia > Prague (0.04)
- Sweden > Vaestra Goetaland
- Gothenburg (0.04)
- Russia > Northwestern Federal District
- Leningrad Oblast > Saint Petersburg (0.04)
- Poland > Podlaskie Province
- Bialystok (0.04)
- Germany > Bavaria
- Upper Bavaria > Munich (0.04)
- Genre:
- Research Report (1.00)
- Technology: