Enterprise Large Language Model Evaluation Benchmark
Wang, Liya, Yi, David, Jose, Damien, Passarelli, John, Gao, James, Leventis, Jordan, Li, Kang
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Large Language Models (LLMs) ) have demonstrated promise in boosting productivity across AI-powered tools, yet existing benchmarks like Massive Multitask Language Understanding (MMLU) inadequately assess enterprise-specific task complexities. We propose a 14-task framework grounded in Bloom's Taxonomy to holistically evaluate LLM capabilities in enterprise contexts. To address challenges of noisy data and costly annotation, we develop a scalable pipeline combining LLM-as-a-Labeler, LLM-as-a-Judge, and corrective retrieval-augmented generation (CRAG), curating a robust 9,700-sample benchmark. Evaluation of six leading models shows open-source contenders like DeepSeek R1 rival proprietary models in reasoning tasks but lag in judgment-based scenarios, likely due to overthinking. Our benchmark reveals critical enterprise performance gaps and offers actionable insights for model optimization. This work provides enterprises a blueprint for tailored evaluations and advances practical LLM deployment.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Jun-26-2025
- Country:
- South America > Colombia
- Meta Department > Villavicencio (0.04)
- North America > United States
- Pennsylvania > Philadelphia County > Philadelphia (0.04)
- Europe
- Czechia > Prague (0.04)
- Spain > Catalonia
- Barcelona Province > Barcelona (0.04)
- Ireland > Leinster
- County Dublin > Dublin (0.04)
- Belgium > Brussels-Capital Region
- Brussels (0.04)
- Asia
- South America > Colombia
- Genre:
- Research Report > New Finding (1.00)
- Industry:
- Education (0.93)
- Technology: