Towards an optimised evaluation of teachers' discourse: The case of engaging messages

High-quality professional development for teachers can facilitate the learning of best teaching practices, which in turn can lead to higher levels of student performance (Borko et al., 2010; Didion et al., 2020; Gore et al., 2021; Hubers et al., 2022; Schelling & Rubenstein, 2023). For instance, feedback on actual practices has proven effective in enhancing teaching methods and subsequently improving student outcomes (Allen et al., 2011; Gregory et al., 2017), even among students not directly taught by the teachers receiving the feedback (Opper, 2019). Thus, focusing on the evaluation of teaching practices to facilitate professional development is essential, as it can lead to improved teaching methods and ultimately to higher levels of student outcomes. Despite its acknowledged importance and the pressures from high-stakes accountability systems, most professional development opportunities remain fragmented and insufficient to meet teachers' needs (Borko, 2004; Hsu & Malkin, 2013). The reason for this may be that, although it is known that teaching practices such as cognitive activation, supportive climate, and classroom management, are relevant for enhancing teaching quality and student outcomes (Xie & Derakhshan, 2021), these dimensions may be too abstract or general, which can hinder the implementation of concrete actions to improve teaching quality. In this regard, evidence suggests that targeting more specific factors for intervention, rather than abstract ones, allows teachers to better understand and change their practices (Soderberg et al., 2015).