Commonsense Reasoning and Large Network Analysis: A Computational Study of ConceptNet 4

Our aim is to compute the minimal data-set implied by the assertions of the English language, extract it from the database, and store it in files of our own format. Towards this direction we read the table of assertions (conceptnet assertion) and keep the entries that have their language id set to en. According to Table A.1 in Appendix A, every assertion is associated with entries from the database tables conceptnet concept (Table A.2), conceptnet relation (Table A.3), nl frequency (Table A.4), conceptnet frame (Table A.5), conceptnet surfaceform (Table A.6), and conceptnet rawassertion (Table A.7). Through conceptnet rawassertion the assertions are also associated with the actual sentences which are located in the table corpus sentence (Table A.6). Moreover, we do not need any other table from the database, as the important entries from all the above tables are contained in among these tables. It turns out that reading once the assertions and then all the entries referenced from the assertions in the English language is not enough to produce a minimal consistent data-set. Section 1.1 explains why, and gives a high-level overview of the process that we follow in order to compute the closure of the data-set implied by the assertions of the English language. However, before we describe these reasons we mention which fields we are going to keep from each table of the original ConceptNet 4 database.