Energy and Emissions of Machine Learning on Smartphones vs. the Cloud

Communications of the ACM 

Global climate change is a huge challenge facing society today. The rapid growth of computing overall and of machine learning (ML) in particular rightfully raises concerns about their carbon footprints. As an early and enthusiastic adopter of ML, a manufacturer of millions of smartphones annually, and a significant cloud provider, Google is in a nearly unique position to compare the impact and efficiency of ML on the two ends of the information technology (IT) computing spectrum. Keep in mind this article is not a comparison of all computation done on phones and the cloud, but solely on the impact of ML on energy use and operational CO2e. We provide the data to support these insights. While primarily focused on operational CO2e generated from computer use, we also address the relative impact of embodied CO2e. Computers in datacenters draw electricity from the grid continuously. Because smartphones operate from a battery, they only draw electricity from the grid when connected to a charger. To account for smartphone ML energy accurately, we must include the energy overhead of their chargers. Wireless charging is increasingly popular due to its convenience and the reduction in smartphone wear and tear by avoiding the repeated insertion of a cable. For wired charging, energy is lost from the AC/DC power adapter in the charger and in the power management integrated circuit (PMIC) battery charger in the phone. Wireless charging loses additional energy through the inductive coils.

Duplicate Docs Excel Report

Title
None found

Similar Docs  Excel Report  more

TitleSimilaritySource
None found