Racial/Ethnic Categories in AI and Algorithmic Fairness: Why They Matter and What They Represent

Racial diversity has become increasingly discussed within the AI The utilization of racial and ethnic categories in the development and algorithmic fairness literature, yet little attention is focused on of datasets and models facilitates the inclusion and documentation justifying the choices of racial categories and understanding how of diverse perspectives. Racial and ethnic categories are especially people are racialized into these chosen racial categories. Even less crucial for datasets and models in which race and ethnicity attention is given to how racial categories shift and how the racialization serve as relevant factors, may act as confounding variables, or enable process changes depending on the context of a dataset or the ability to audit for fairness using race and ethnicity for model. An unclear understanding of who comprises the racial categories fairness purposes. For example, understanding the racial and/or chosen and how people are racialized into these categories ethnic target of hate speech is crucial for understanding the impact can lead to varying interpretations of these categories. These varying of hate speech, as hate speech can differ based on the race interpretations can lead to harm when the understanding of and/or ethnicity of the target[48]. Similarly, in health, race is correlated racial categories and the racialization process is misaligned from with health outcomes[6], and knowledge of a patient's race the actual racialization process and racial categories used. Harm and ethnicity can help contextualize the patient's experience and can also arise if the racialization process and racial categories used health history[53]. In algorithmic fairness settings, knowledge of are irrelevant ordonot exist inthecontext they areapplied.