The Full Rights Dilemma for A.I. Systems of Debatable Personhood
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Abstract: An Artificially Intelligent system (an AI) has debatable personhood if it's epistemically possible either that the AI is a person or that it falls far short of personhood. Debatable personhood is a likely outcome of AI development and might arise soon. Debatable AI personhood throws us into a catastrophic moral dilemma: Either treat the systems as moral persons and risk sacrificing real human interests for the sake of entities without interests worth the sacrifice, or don't treat the systems as moral persons and risk perpetrating grievous moral wrongs against them. The moral issues become even more perplexing if we consider cases of possibly conscious AI that are subhuman, superhuman, or highly divergent from us in their morally relevant properties. We might soon build artificially intelligent entities - AIs - of debatable personhood. Our systems and habits of ethical thinking are currently as unprepared for this decision as medieval physics was for space flight.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Feb-21-2023
- Country:
- North America > United States
- Massachusetts > Middlesex County
- Cambridge (0.14)
- California > Riverside County
- Riverside (0.14)
- Massachusetts > Middlesex County
- Europe
- United Kingdom > England
- Oxfordshire > Oxford (0.05)
- Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Switzerland > Basel-City
- Basel (0.04)
- United Kingdom > England
- North America > United States
- Genre:
- Research Report (0.40)
- Personal (0.34)
- Industry:
- Leisure & Entertainment (0.93)
- Media (0.93)
- Government (0.93)
- Law > Civil Rights & Constitutional Law (0.46)
- Health & Medicine > Therapeutic Area (0.46)
- Technology:
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence
- Robots (1.00)
- Cognitive Science (1.00)
- Issues > Social & Ethical Issues (0.93)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence